Strategic Attention Guidance: The Impact of Dual and Single Cues in Wide Field of View Searches

Visual search tasks occur in real-world situations, like soldiers in the battlefield identifying hostile targets, where information may fall outside the immediate field of view (FOV). This experiment assessed the effectiveness of attention cues in a wide FOV search task, comparing single versus dual cues that were either perfectly or imperfectly reliable. Participants searched for routine targets and an occasional high-priority target. Results showed that perfect cues improved performance more than an unaided search, with dual cues outperforming single cues. However, when cues were imperfect and automation failed, performance suffered. The notable increase in errors during automation failures suggests a level of automation bias, which was greatest with the dual cues. These findings highlight the benefits of dual cues in wide FOV scenes where critical information may be outside the immediate FOV. However, in high-stakes situations, like detecting explosive devices, caution is advised when cues are imperfect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241275512
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategic Attention Guidance: The Impact of Dual and Single Cues in Wide Field of View Searches

Amelia C. Warden
1 citations
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
0.34
article

Strategic Attention Guidance: The Impact of Dual and Single Cues in Wide Field of View Searches

Amelia C. Warden
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Visual search tasks occur in real-world situations, like soldiers in the battlefield identifying hostile targets, where information may fall outside the immediate field of view (FOV). This experiment assessed the effectiveness of attention cues in a wide FOV search task, comparing single versus dual cues that were either perfectly or imperfectly reliable. Participants searched for routine targets and an occasional high-priority target. Results showed that perfect cues improved performance more than an unaided search, with dual cues outperforming single cues. However, when cues were imperfect and automation failed, performance suffered. The notable increase in errors during automation failures suggests a level of automation bias, which was greatest with the dual cues. These findings highlight the benefits of dual cues in wide FOV scenes where critical information may be outside the immediate FOV. However, in high-stakes situations, like detecting explosive devices, caution is advised when cues are imperfect.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 68(1)
Colorado State University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.