Educationally authentic assessment: reframing authentic assessment in relation to students’ meaningful engagement

With increasing calls for authentic assessment in higher education, the reference point for authenticity has been questioned. Typically, researchers define authenticity in relation to purposes of higher education, which are contested. Advancing the notion of educational authenticity rather than professional, societal, disciplinary, or developmental authenticity, we shift the reference point from outcomes to the process of meaningful student engagement. To illuminate features of educational authenticity in assessment, we surveyed students about their most interesting, engaging assessment and analysed 302 explanations why that assignment was so engaging. While many students cited real-world connections, consistent with most authentic assessment literature, more described having choice in some aspect of the assignment. We examined how choice, not typically a defining feature of authentic assessment, and real-world connection mattered to students and promoted meaningful engagement. Understanding and designing for educational authenticity can lead to various, valued outcomes highlighted in existing authentic assessment literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teaching in Higher Education
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2024.2394042
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
37.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Educationally authentic assessment: reframing authentic assessment in relation to students’ meaningful engagement

Kathleen M. Quinlan, Wissia Fiorucci, Guadalupe Sellei
18 citations
Teaching in Higher Education
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
37.73
article

Educationally authentic assessment: reframing authentic assessment in relation to students’ meaningful engagement

Kathleen M. Quinlan, Wissia Fiorucci, Guadalupe Sellei
article en
18 citations

Abstract

With increasing calls for authentic assessment in higher education, the reference point for authenticity has been questioned. Typically, researchers define authenticity in relation to purposes of higher education, which are contested. Advancing the notion of educational authenticity rather than professional, societal, disciplinary, or developmental authenticity, we shift the reference point from outcomes to the process of meaningful student engagement. To illuminate features of educational authenticity in assessment, we surveyed students about their most interesting, engaging assessment and analysed 302 explanations why that assignment was so engaging. While many students cited real-world connections, consistent with most authentic assessment literature, more described having choice in some aspect of the assignment. We examined how choice, not typically a defining feature of authentic assessment, and real-world connection mattered to students and promoted meaningful engagement. Understanding and designing for educational authenticity can lead to various, valued outcomes highlighted in existing authentic assessment literature.

Teaching in Higher EducationVol. 30(3)
University of Kent (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
37.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.