A New Five-step Method for Advanced Evaluation of Shale Gas Formations and a Field Case Study of Marcellus Shale

Abstract This paper presents a new five-step method to evaluate shale gas formations with intricate pore networks. The method overcomes challenges posed by traditional workflows through an improved workflow and a new unconventional petrophysical model: (a) the new model accurately defines components of shale gas formations, including effective and isolated pores occupied by free and adsorbed gas; (b) total organic carbon (TOC) is evaluated using three techniques using conventional well logs to determine which techniques are more accurate; and (c) the improved method provides integrated evaluation of geomechanical properties, resources in place, and selection of stimulation candidate. Our field case study on Marcellus shale shows that (a) density-based TOC technique is more accurate and average TOC in the study area is 2.8%; (b) density porosity model is more reliable and average porosity in the study area is 8.5%. Positive correlation between TOCs and porosities in the upper and lower Marcellus suggests that effective pores contribute more significantly to the pore network than isolated pores; (c) gas in place is 120 Bcf with 60% free gas for a drilling unit of 640 acres. Large contrasts in Young's modulus (1 million psi) and minimum in situ stress (893 psi) along the upper Marcellus-Stafford limestone boundary, and resistivity separations in the lower Marcellus member, show that the upper Marcellus is a good stimulation candidate. This method and field case study provide valuable insights to evaluate Marcellus shale reservoirs and improve economic recovery of the resources in place.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of energy resources technology.
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4066417
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A New Five-step Method for Advanced Evaluation of Shale Gas Formations and a Field Case Study of Marcellus Shale

Derek Elsworth, Levent Taylan Ozgur Yildirim, John Wang
Journal of energy resources technology.
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
article

A New Five-step Method for Advanced Evaluation of Shale Gas Formations and a Field Case Study of Marcellus Shale

Derek Elsworth, Levent Taylan Ozgur Yildirim, John Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents a new five-step method to evaluate shale gas formations with intricate pore networks. The method overcomes challenges posed by traditional workflows through an improved workflow and a new unconventional petrophysical model: (a) the new model accurately defines components of shale gas formations, including effective and isolated pores occupied by free and adsorbed gas; (b) total organic carbon (TOC) is evaluated using three techniques using conventional well logs to determine which techniques are more accurate; and (c) the improved method provides integrated evaluation of geomechanical properties, resources in place, and selection of stimulation candidate. Our field case study on Marcellus shale shows that (a) density-based TOC technique is more accurate and average TOC in the study area is 2.8%; (b) density porosity model is more reliable and average porosity in the study area is 8.5%. Positive correlation between TOCs and porosities in the upper and lower Marcellus suggests that effective pores contribute more significantly to the pore network than isolated pores; (c) gas in place is 120 Bcf with 60% free gas for a drilling unit of 640 acres. Large contrasts in Young's modulus (1 million psi) and minimum in situ stress (893 psi) along the upper Marcellus-Stafford limestone boundary, and resistivity separations in the lower Marcellus member, show that the upper Marcellus is a good stimulation candidate. This method and field case study provide valuable insights to evaluate Marcellus shale reservoirs and improve economic recovery of the resources in place.

Journal of energy resources technology.Vol. 1(2)
Pennsylvania State University (US), Park University (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.