Prospective Comparison of Nine Different Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS) Devices by Ultrasound Experts with Regard to B-Scan Quality, Device Handling and Software in Abdominal Sonography

This is the first comprehensive study to directly compare different HHUS devices in a head-to-head manner. While the majority of the tested devices demonstrated satisfactory performance, notable discrepancies were observed between them. In particular, the B-scan quality exhibited considerable variation, which may have implications for the clinical application of HHUS. The findings of this study can assist in the selection of an appropriate HHUS device for specific applications, considering the clinical objectives and acknowledging the inherent limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14171913
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prospective Comparison of Nine Different Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS) Devices by Ultrasound Experts with Regard to B-Scan Quality, Device Handling and Software in Abdominal Sonography

Johannes Ruppert, Masuod Yousefzada, Moritz Herzog, Christoph Schneider et al.
8 citations
Diagnostics
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
3.37
article

Prospective Comparison of Nine Different Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS) Devices by Ultrasound Experts with Regard to B-Scan Quality, Device Handling and Software in Abdominal Sonography

Johannes Ruppert, Masuod Yousefzada, Moritz Herzog, Christoph Schneider, Andreas Weimer, Christian Lueders, Holger Buggenhagen, Julia Weinmann‐Menke, Thomas Vieth, Liv Annebritt Lorenz, Johannes Weimer, Daniel Merkel
article en
8 citations

Abstract

This is the first comprehensive study to directly compare different HHUS devices in a head-to-head manner. While the majority of the tested devices demonstrated satisfactory performance, notable discrepancies were observed between them. In particular, the B-scan quality exhibited considerable variation, which may have implications for the clinical application of HHUS. The findings of this study can assist in the selection of an appropriate HHUS device for specific applications, considering the clinical objectives and acknowledging the inherent limitations.

DiagnosticsVol. 14(17)
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (DE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
3.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Prospective Comparison of Nine Different Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS) Devices by Ultrasound Experts with Regard to B-Scan Quality, Device Handling and Software in Abdominal Sonography — Johannes Ruppert, Masuod Yousefzada, et al. · Diagnostics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS