Dynamic Spending Responses to Wealth Shocks: Evidence from Quasi Lotteries on the Stock Market

How much and over what horizon do households adjust their consumption in response to stock market wealth shocks? We address these questions using granular data on spending and stock portfolios from a large bank and exploiting lottery-like variation in gains across investors with similar portfolio characteristics. Consistent with the permanent income hypothesis, spending responses to stock market gains are immediate and persistent. The monthly responses cumulate to marginal propensities to consume of 4.4 percent over one year and 16 percent over three years. The results suggest that inattention attenuates household responses to stock market cycles over horizons as long as one year. (JEL D12, E21, G11, G14, G51)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Economic Review Insights
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20230382
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Spending Responses to Wealth Shocks: Evidence from Quasi Lotteries on the Stock Market

Asger Lau Andersen, Adam Sheridan, Niels Johannesen
4 citations
American Economic Review Insights
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
1.08
article

Dynamic Spending Responses to Wealth Shocks: Evidence from Quasi Lotteries on the Stock Market

Asger Lau Andersen, Adam Sheridan, Niels Johannesen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

How much and over what horizon do households adjust their consumption in response to stock market wealth shocks? We address these questions using granular data on spending and stock portfolios from a large bank and exploiting lottery-like variation in gains across investors with similar portfolio characteristics. Consistent with the permanent income hypothesis, spending responses to stock market gains are immediate and persistent. The monthly responses cumulate to marginal propensities to consume of 4.4 percent over one year and 16 percent over three years. The results suggest that inattention attenuates household responses to stock market cycles over horizons as long as one year. (JEL D12, E21, G11, G14, G51)

American Economic Review InsightsVol. 6(3)
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
1.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.