Is minimally invasive multi-vessel off-pump coronary surgery as safe and effective as MIDCAB?

In experienced hands, MICS CABG is a safe and effective procedure. Survival and durability are comparable with MIDCAB.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1385108
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is minimally invasive multi-vessel off-pump coronary surgery as safe and effective as MIDCAB?

Ragi Nagib, Magdalena Rufa, Marc Albert, Juergen Dippon et al.
7 citations
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
4.01
article

Is minimally invasive multi-vessel off-pump coronary surgery as safe and effective as MIDCAB?

Ragi Nagib, Magdalena Rufa, Marc Albert, Juergen Dippon, Dincer Aktuerk, Adrian Ursulescu, Ulrich Franke
article en
7 citations

Abstract

In experienced hands, MICS CABG is a safe and effective procedure. Survival and durability are comparable with MIDCAB.

Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicineVol. 11
University of Stuttgart (DE), St Bartholomew's Hospital (GB), Robert Bosch Hospital (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
4.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.