Freedom of speech on campus

Abstract What should be the rules governing campus speech in a liberal democratic society? On one side are those arguing for maximal protections for campus speech analogous to the First Amendment in the United States. On the other are those promoting stricter regulation of speech through formal and informal speech codes. This paper aims to carve a new path in the conversation. Both sides agree that the mission of the university is the discovery and dissemination of knowledge and that achieving this mission requires tolerant and open-minded students, faculty, and administrators. However, neither side has explicitly connected its advocacy for specific speech policies with these shared goals. Our paper advances the conversation by proposing a series of empirically testable mechanisms for connecting speech policies to the desired outcomes. We also argue that focusing on these mechanisms opens the way towards new and more tractable conceptual and normative debates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Philosophical Quarterly
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqae095
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Academic Freedom and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Freedom of speech on campus

Alexandra Oprea, Alexandru Marcoci
1 citations
The Philosophical Quarterly
Academic Freedom and Politics
2.23
article

Freedom of speech on campus

Alexandra Oprea, Alexandru Marcoci
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract What should be the rules governing campus speech in a liberal democratic society? On one side are those arguing for maximal protections for campus speech analogous to the First Amendment in the United States. On the other are those promoting stricter regulation of speech through formal and informal speech codes. This paper aims to carve a new path in the conversation. Both sides agree that the mission of the university is the discovery and dissemination of knowledge and that achieving this mission requires tolerant and open-minded students, faculty, and administrators. However, neither side has explicitly connected its advocacy for specific speech policies with these shared goals. Our paper advances the conversation by proposing a series of empirically testable mechanisms for connecting speech policies to the desired outcomes. We also argue that focusing on these mechanisms opens the way towards new and more tractable conceptual and normative debates.

The Philosophical QuarterlyVol. 74(4)
University of Nottingham (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Academic Freedom and Politics
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Freedom of speech on campus — Alexandra Oprea, Alexandru Marcoci · The Philosophical Quarterly (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS