Evaluation of Anopheline Diversity and Abundance across Outdoor Collection Schemes Utilizing CDC Light Traps in Nchelenge District, Zambia

In the global fight against malaria, standard vector control methods such as indoor residual spraying (IRS) and insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) are intended to protect inside residential structures and sleeping spaces. However, these methods can still leave individuals vulnerable to residual transmission from vectors that they may be exposed to outdoors. Nchelenge District in northern Zambia experiences persistently high malaria transmission even with ITNs and IRS in place. However, very few studies have examined outdoor vector activity. To assess the diversity and abundance of outdoor foraging female anopheline mosquitoes, CDC light traps were used as proxy measures for mosquito host-seeking, set in three outdoor trapping schemes randomly assigned on different nights: (1) locations where people congregate at night outside of the house within the peri-domestic space, (2) animal pens or shelters, and (3) high-human-traffic areas, such as paths to latrines, where traps were baited with BG-Lure<sup>®</sup>. A total of 1087 total female anophelines were collected over a total of 74 trap nights. <i>Anopheles funestus</i> s.s. comprised the majority of the collection (86%), with <i>An. gambiae</i> s.s. (2%) and a highly diverse sampling of other anophelines (12%) making up the remainder. <i>Plasmodium falciparum</i> parasites were only detected in <i>An. funestus</i> (1%). No significant difference in species diversity or female anopheline abundance was detected between trapping schemes. Outdoor foraging anopheline mosquitoes, including a number of infectious <i>An. funestus</i>, may partially explain the difficulty of controlling malaria transmission in Nchelenge District, where vector control is only targeted indoors. BG-Lure<sup>®</sup> shows some promise as an alternative to human-baited landing catch collections in this resource-poor setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insects
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15090656
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Anopheline Diversity and Abundance across Outdoor Collection Schemes Utilizing CDC Light Traps in Nchelenge District, Zambia

Jennifer C. Stevenson, James Sichivula Lupiya, David Mbewe, Douglas E. Norris et al.
1 citations
Insects
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
0.54
article

Evaluation of Anopheline Diversity and Abundance across Outdoor Collection Schemes Utilizing CDC Light Traps in Nchelenge District, Zambia

Jennifer C. Stevenson, James Sichivula Lupiya, David Mbewe, Douglas E. Norris, Ilinca I. Ciubotariu, Mary E. Gebhardt, Mbanga Muleba, Christine M. Jones
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the global fight against malaria, standard vector control methods such as indoor residual spraying (IRS) and insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) are intended to protect inside residential structures and sleeping spaces. However, these methods can still leave individuals vulnerable to residual transmission from vectors that they may be exposed to outdoors. Nchelenge District in northern Zambia experiences persistently high malaria transmission even with ITNs and IRS in place. However, very few studies have examined outdoor vector activity. To assess the diversity and abundance of outdoor foraging female anopheline mosquitoes, CDC light traps were used as proxy measures for mosquito host-seeking, set in three outdoor trapping schemes randomly assigned on different nights: (1) locations where people congregate at night outside of the house within the peri-domestic space, (2) animal pens or shelters, and (3) high-human-traffic areas, such as paths to latrines, where traps were baited with BG-Lure<sup>®</sup>. A total of 1087 total female anophelines were collected over a total of 74 trap nights. <i>Anopheles funestus</i> s.s. comprised the majority of the collection (86%), with <i>An. gambiae</i> s.s. (2%) and a highly diverse sampling of other anophelines (12%) making up the remainder. <i>Plasmodium falciparum</i> parasites were only detected in <i>An. funestus</i> (1%). No significant difference in species diversity or female anopheline abundance was detected between trapping schemes. Outdoor foraging anopheline mosquitoes, including a number of infectious <i>An. funestus</i>, may partially explain the difficulty of controlling malaria transmission in Nchelenge District, where vector control is only targeted indoors. BG-Lure<sup>®</sup> shows some promise as an alternative to human-baited landing catch collections in this resource-poor setting.

InsectsVol. 15(9)
Ifakara Health Institute (TZ), Johns Hopkins University (US), Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (CH), Tropical Diseases Research Centre (ZM)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Mosquito-borne diseases and control
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.