Family Presence During Resuscitation: Perspectives of Saudi Emergency Medicine Providers

Background Family presence during resuscitation (FPDR) has been a long-debated topic in medical circles in the last 40 years. Studies usually concentrate on the opinions and responses of the family members of the patients being resuscitated. Only a handful of studies have focussed on the medical practitioner's opinions and beliefs on the topic. Hence, this study aimed to investigate opinions and beliefs regarding FPDR among emergency medicine practitioners (EMPs) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Methodology This was a self-filled, questionnaire-based study conducted among 450 EMPs across the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Proportions and subgroup analyses were conducted with respect to gender, experience, and seniority. EMPs were asked about the number of family members they would allow to attend the resuscitation of a patient under their care in different clinical scenarios. Results A total of 392 (87.1%) EMPs participated in this study. Overall, 64% (n = 250) of EMPs reported that they would not allow FPDR in cases that involved trauma, or if the patient being revived was female. This percentage dropped to about 33% (n = 129) when the patient being resuscitated was a child or in out-of-hospital arrest. The majority of EMPs believed that the decision to allow FPDR was the physician's decision (n = 251, 64.8%) and not the right of the family (n = 133, 34.7%). Moreover, emergency medicine board-certified physicians were more likely to allow FPDR in different cases with 19 (18.5%) in adult arrest cases, 18 (18%) in pediatric cases, and 16 (15.1%) in trauma cases, than non-board-certified practitioners (p = 0.001, 0.007, and 0.031, respectively). Female EMPs were more likely to refuse FPDR than their male counterparts (p < 0.001). Conclusions Approximately, 60-70% of EMPs allowed a member of the family to attend the resuscitation of their loved one. However, this percentage dropped in cases where the patient was a female, or the case was a trauma case instead of a medical case. Most Saudi EMPs believed that FPDR hurts the resuscitating team and might hinder the resuscitation efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.68218
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Family Presence During Resuscitation: Perspectives of Saudi Emergency Medicine Providers

Anas Hamam, Amro M Gaafar, Iyad S Kinsarah, Nawaf Ateya Alzahrani
1 citations
Cureus
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
0.45
article

Family Presence During Resuscitation: Perspectives of Saudi Emergency Medicine Providers

Anas Hamam, Amro M Gaafar, Iyad S Kinsarah, Nawaf Ateya Alzahrani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background Family presence during resuscitation (FPDR) has been a long-debated topic in medical circles in the last 40 years. Studies usually concentrate on the opinions and responses of the family members of the patients being resuscitated. Only a handful of studies have focussed on the medical practitioner's opinions and beliefs on the topic. Hence, this study aimed to investigate opinions and beliefs regarding FPDR among emergency medicine practitioners (EMPs) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Methodology This was a self-filled, questionnaire-based study conducted among 450 EMPs across the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Proportions and subgroup analyses were conducted with respect to gender, experience, and seniority. EMPs were asked about the number of family members they would allow to attend the resuscitation of a patient under their care in different clinical scenarios. Results A total of 392 (87.1%) EMPs participated in this study. Overall, 64% (n = 250) of EMPs reported that they would not allow FPDR in cases that involved trauma, or if the patient being revived was female. This percentage dropped to about 33% (n = 129) when the patient being resuscitated was a child or in out-of-hospital arrest. The majority of EMPs believed that the decision to allow FPDR was the physician's decision (n = 251, 64.8%) and not the right of the family (n = 133, 34.7%). Moreover, emergency medicine board-certified physicians were more likely to allow FPDR in different cases with 19 (18.5%) in adult arrest cases, 18 (18%) in pediatric cases, and 16 (15.1%) in trauma cases, than non-board-certified practitioners (p = 0.001, 0.007, and 0.031, respectively). Female EMPs were more likely to refuse FPDR than their male counterparts (p < 0.001). Conclusions Approximately, 60-70% of EMPs allowed a member of the family to attend the resuscitation of their loved one. However, this percentage dropped in cases where the patient was a female, or the case was a trauma case instead of a medical case. Most Saudi EMPs believed that FPDR hurts the resuscitating team and might hinder the resuscitation efforts.

CureusVol. 16(8)
King Fahd Armed Forces Hospital (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
0.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.