Portable Sensors for Dynamic Exposure Assessments in Urban Environments: State of the Science

This study presents a fit-for-purpose lab and field evaluation of commercially available portable sensor systems for PM, NO<sub>2</sub>, and/or BC. The main aim of the study is to identify portable sensor systems that are capable of reliably quantifying dynamic exposure gradients in urban environments. After an initial literature and market study resulting in 39 sensor systems, 10 sensor systems were ultimately purchased and benchmarked under laboratory and real-word conditions. We evaluated the comparability to reference analyzers, sensor precision, and sensitivity towards environmental confounders (temperature, humidity, and O<sub>3</sub>). Moreover, we evaluated if the sensor accuracy can be improved by applying a lab or field calibration. Because the targeted application of the sensor systems under evaluation is mobile monitoring, we conducted a mobile field test in an urban environment to evaluate the GPS accuracy and potential impacts from vibrations on the resulting sensor signals. Results of the considered sensor systems indicate that out-of-the-box performance is relatively good for PM (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.68-0.9, Uexp = 16-66%, BSU = 0.1-0.7 µg/m<sup>3</sup>) and BC (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.82-0.83), but maturity of the tested NO<sub>2</sub> sensors is still low (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.38-0.55, Uexp = 111-614%) and additional efforts are needed in terms of signal noise and calibration, as proven by the performance after multilinear calibration (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.75-0.83, Uexp = 37-44%)). The horizontal accuracy of the built-in GPS was generally good, achieving <10 m accuracy for all sensor systems. More accurate and dynamic exposure assessments in contemporary urban environments are crucial to study real-world exposure of individuals and the resulting impacts on potential health endpoints. A greater availability of mobile monitoring systems capable of quantifying urban pollutant gradients will further boost this line of research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s24175653
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Portable Sensors for Dynamic Exposure Assessments in Urban Environments: State of the Science

Borislav Lazarov, Jelle Hofman, Evelyne Elst, Martine Van Poppel et al.
6 citations
Sensors
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
1.23
article

Portable Sensors for Dynamic Exposure Assessments in Urban Environments: State of the Science

Borislav Lazarov, Jelle Hofman, Evelyne Elst, Martine Van Poppel, Christophe Stroobants, Inge Smets
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This study presents a fit-for-purpose lab and field evaluation of commercially available portable sensor systems for PM, NO<sub>2</sub>, and/or BC. The main aim of the study is to identify portable sensor systems that are capable of reliably quantifying dynamic exposure gradients in urban environments. After an initial literature and market study resulting in 39 sensor systems, 10 sensor systems were ultimately purchased and benchmarked under laboratory and real-word conditions. We evaluated the comparability to reference analyzers, sensor precision, and sensitivity towards environmental confounders (temperature, humidity, and O<sub>3</sub>). Moreover, we evaluated if the sensor accuracy can be improved by applying a lab or field calibration. Because the targeted application of the sensor systems under evaluation is mobile monitoring, we conducted a mobile field test in an urban environment to evaluate the GPS accuracy and potential impacts from vibrations on the resulting sensor signals. Results of the considered sensor systems indicate that out-of-the-box performance is relatively good for PM (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.68-0.9, Uexp = 16-66%, BSU = 0.1-0.7 µg/m<sup>3</sup>) and BC (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.82-0.83), but maturity of the tested NO<sub>2</sub> sensors is still low (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.38-0.55, Uexp = 111-614%) and additional efforts are needed in terms of signal noise and calibration, as proven by the performance after multilinear calibration (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.75-0.83, Uexp = 37-44%)). The horizontal accuracy of the built-in GPS was generally good, achieving <10 m accuracy for all sensor systems. More accurate and dynamic exposure assessments in contemporary urban environments are crucial to study real-world exposure of individuals and the resulting impacts on potential health endpoints. A greater availability of mobile monitoring systems capable of quantifying urban pollutant gradients will further boost this line of research.

SensorsVol. 24(17)
Flanders Environment Agency (BE), Flemish Institute for Technological Research (BE)
European Commission
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
1.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.