Tertiary Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Where Do We Stand?

Research into explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods has exploded over the past five years. It is essential to synthesize and categorize this research and, for this purpose, multiple systematic reviews on XAI mapped out the landscape of the existing methods. To understand how these methods have developed and been applied and what evidence has been accumulated through model training and analysis, we carried out a tertiary literature review that takes as input systematic literature reviews published between 1992 and 2023. We evaluated 40 systematic literature review papers and presented binary tabular overviews of researched XAI methods and their respective characteristics, such as the scope, scale, input data, explanation data, and machine learning models researched. We identified seven distinct characteristics and organized them into twelve specific categories, culminating in the creation of comprehensive research grids. Within these research grids, we systematically documented the presence or absence of research mentions for each pairing of characteristic and category. We identified 14 combinations that are open to research. Our findings reveal a significant gap, particularly in categories like the cross-section of feature graphs and numerical data, which appear to be notably absent or insufficiently addressed in the existing body of research and thus represent a future research road map.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/make6030098
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tertiary Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Where Do We Stand?

Annemarie Jutte, Faiza Allah Bukhsh, Faizan Ahmed, Frank van Mourik et al.
8 citations
Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2.78
article

Tertiary Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Where Do We Stand?

Annemarie Jutte, Faiza Allah Bukhsh, Faizan Ahmed, Frank van Mourik, Stijn E. Berendse
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Research into explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods has exploded over the past five years. It is essential to synthesize and categorize this research and, for this purpose, multiple systematic reviews on XAI mapped out the landscape of the existing methods. To understand how these methods have developed and been applied and what evidence has been accumulated through model training and analysis, we carried out a tertiary literature review that takes as input systematic literature reviews published between 1992 and 2023. We evaluated 40 systematic literature review papers and presented binary tabular overviews of researched XAI methods and their respective characteristics, such as the scope, scale, input data, explanation data, and machine learning models researched. We identified seven distinct characteristics and organized them into twelve specific categories, culminating in the creation of comprehensive research grids. Within these research grids, we systematically documented the presence or absence of research mentions for each pairing of characteristic and category. We identified 14 combinations that are open to research. Our findings reveal a significant gap, particularly in categories like the cross-section of feature graphs and numerical data, which appear to be notably absent or insufficiently addressed in the existing body of research and thus represent a future research road map.

Machine Learning and Knowledge ExtractionVol. 6(3)
Saxion (NL), University of Twente (NL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tertiary Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Where Do We Stand? — Annemarie Jutte, Faiza Allah Bukhsh, et al. · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS