Comparison of professional and everyday wearable technology at different body positions in terms of recording gait perturbations

Falls are a significant health problem in older people, so preventing them is essential. Since falls are often a consequence of improper reaction to gait disturbances, such as slips and trips, their detection is gaining attention in research. However there are no studies to date that investigated perturbation detection, using everyday wearable devices like hearing aids or smartphones at different body positions. Sixty-six study participants were perturbed on a split-belt treadmill while recording data with hearing aids, smartphones, and professional inertial measurement units (IMUs) at various positions (left/right ear, jacket pocket, shoulder bag, pants pocket, left/right foot, left/right wrist, lumbar, sternum). The data were visually inspected and median maximum cross-correlations were calculated for whole trials and different perturbation conditions. The results show that the hearing aids and IMUs perform equally in measuring acceleration data (correlation coefficient of 0.93 for the left hearing aid and 0.99 for the right hearing aid), which emphasizes the potential of utilizing sensors in hearing aids for head acceleration measurements. Additionally, the data implicate that measurement with a single hearing aid is sufficient and a second hearing aid provides no added value. Furthermore, the acceleration patterns were similar for the ear position, the jacket pocket position, and the lumbar (correlation coefficient of about 0.8) or sternal position (correlation coefficient of about 0.9). The correlations were found to be more or less independent of the type of perturbation. Data obtained from everyday wearable devices appears to represent the movements of the human body during perturbations similar to that of professional devices. The results suggest that IMUs in hearing aids and smartphones, placed at the trunk, could be well suited for an automatic detection of gait perturbations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Digital Health
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000553
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of professional and everyday wearable technology at different body positions in terms of recording gait perturbations

Sandra Hellmers, Lea Feld, Andreas Hein, Tania Zieschang et al.
4 citations
PLOS Digital Health
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
4.58
article

Comparison of professional and everyday wearable technology at different body positions in terms of recording gait perturbations

Sandra Hellmers, Lea Feld, Andreas Hein, Tania Zieschang, Jessica Koschate, Birger Kollmeier, Lena Schell-Majoor
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Falls are a significant health problem in older people, so preventing them is essential. Since falls are often a consequence of improper reaction to gait disturbances, such as slips and trips, their detection is gaining attention in research. However there are no studies to date that investigated perturbation detection, using everyday wearable devices like hearing aids or smartphones at different body positions. Sixty-six study participants were perturbed on a split-belt treadmill while recording data with hearing aids, smartphones, and professional inertial measurement units (IMUs) at various positions (left/right ear, jacket pocket, shoulder bag, pants pocket, left/right foot, left/right wrist, lumbar, sternum). The data were visually inspected and median maximum cross-correlations were calculated for whole trials and different perturbation conditions. The results show that the hearing aids and IMUs perform equally in measuring acceleration data (correlation coefficient of 0.93 for the left hearing aid and 0.99 for the right hearing aid), which emphasizes the potential of utilizing sensors in hearing aids for head acceleration measurements. Additionally, the data implicate that measurement with a single hearing aid is sufficient and a second hearing aid provides no added value. Furthermore, the acceleration patterns were similar for the ear position, the jacket pocket position, and the lumbar (correlation coefficient of about 0.8) or sternal position (correlation coefficient of about 0.9). The correlations were found to be more or less independent of the type of perturbation. Data obtained from everyday wearable devices appears to represent the movements of the human body during perturbations similar to that of professional devices. The results suggest that IMUs in hearing aids and smartphones, placed at the trunk, could be well suited for an automatic detection of gait perturbations.

PLOS Digital HealthVol. 3(8)
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE), Hearing4all (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
4.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.