Recommended Practices for the Electrochemical Recovery of Cobalt from Lithium Cobalt Oxide: A Case Study of the Choline Chloride:Ethylene Glycol Deep Eutectic Solvent

We recommend best practices for the recovery of cobalt from LiCoO<sub>2</sub> (LCO) lithium-ion battery (LIB) cathodes by (i) leaching using green deep eutectic solvents (DES) and (ii) subsequent electrodeposition, through a case study of the choline chloride (ChCl):ethylene glycol (EG) DES. DES physical properties (conductivity, viscosity, and surface tension) were tailored by varying the composition between mole ratios of 1 : 2 and 1 : 5 (ChCl:EG). Examined along with leaching process parameters (temperature, duration), increasing the fraction of hydrogen bond donors (HBDs) decreased DES surface tension and enhanced leaching. Complete Co recovery was achieved using 1 : 5 ChCl:EG DES at 160 °C and 48 h. Leaching temperatures >160 °C are discouraged due to DES thermal degradation. The electrodeposition process was optimized for selective Co recovery with high faradaic efficiency. The leaching ability of the DES was antithetical to the stability of electrodeposition cell components and required operational parameter adjustment to minimize degradation. The optimized system (copper cathode and stainless-steel anode) employing 1 : 5 DES leachate exhibited a faradaic efficiency of ~80 %, specific Co recovery of ~0.8 mg hr<sup><M-1</sup> cm<sup>-1</sup> at 50 °C and evidence of uniform deposition. DES surface tension is a key descriptor of metal recovery, and guidelines are presented to maximize selective Co recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemSusChem
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202401205
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recommended Practices for the Electrochemical Recovery of Cobalt from Lithium Cobalt Oxide: A Case Study of the Choline Chloride:Ethylene Glycol Deep Eutectic Solvent

Shrihari Sankarasubramanian, Suchithra Ashoka Sahadevan, Mohamed Shahid, Vijay Ramani
6 citations
ChemSusChem
Extraction and Separation Processes
1.28
article

Recommended Practices for the Electrochemical Recovery of Cobalt from Lithium Cobalt Oxide: A Case Study of the Choline Chloride:Ethylene Glycol Deep Eutectic Solvent

Shrihari Sankarasubramanian, Suchithra Ashoka Sahadevan, Mohamed Shahid, Vijay Ramani
article en
6 citations

Abstract

We recommend best practices for the recovery of cobalt from LiCoO<sub>2</sub> (LCO) lithium-ion battery (LIB) cathodes by (i) leaching using green deep eutectic solvents (DES) and (ii) subsequent electrodeposition, through a case study of the choline chloride (ChCl):ethylene glycol (EG) DES. DES physical properties (conductivity, viscosity, and surface tension) were tailored by varying the composition between mole ratios of 1 : 2 and 1 : 5 (ChCl:EG). Examined along with leaching process parameters (temperature, duration), increasing the fraction of hydrogen bond donors (HBDs) decreased DES surface tension and enhanced leaching. Complete Co recovery was achieved using 1 : 5 ChCl:EG DES at 160 °C and 48 h. Leaching temperatures >160 °C are discouraged due to DES thermal degradation. The electrodeposition process was optimized for selective Co recovery with high faradaic efficiency. The leaching ability of the DES was antithetical to the stability of electrodeposition cell components and required operational parameter adjustment to minimize degradation. The optimized system (copper cathode and stainless-steel anode) employing 1 : 5 DES leachate exhibited a faradaic efficiency of ~80 %, specific Co recovery of ~0.8 mg hr<sup><M-1</sup> cm<sup>-1</sup> at 50 °C and evidence of uniform deposition. DES surface tension is a key descriptor of metal recovery, and guidelines are presented to maximize selective Co recovery.

ChemSusChemVol. 18(3)
Washington University in St. Louis (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio (US), University of Petroleum and Energy Studies (IN)
University of Texas at San Antonio
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Extraction and Separation Processes
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.