Materiality and practicality: a response to - are clinicians ethically obligated to disclose their use of medical machine learning systems to patients?

In his recent paper Hatherley discusses four reasons given to support mandatory disclosure of the use of machine learning technologies in healthcare, and provides counters to each of these reasons. While I agree with Hatherley's conclusion that such disclosures should not be mandatory (at least not in an upfront fashion), I raise some problems with his counters to the materiality argument. Finally, I raise another potential problem that exists in a democratic society: that even if Hatherley's (and other authors who share his conclusions) arguments are sound, in a democratic society the simple fact that most people might wish for such disclosures to be made might be an enough compelling reason to make such disclosures mandatory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Ethics
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-110371
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Materiality and practicality: a response to - are clinicians ethically obligated to disclose their use of medical machine learning systems to patients?

Michal Pruski
3 citations
Journal of Medical Ethics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.36
article

Materiality and practicality: a response to - are clinicians ethically obligated to disclose their use of medical machine learning systems to patients?

Michal Pruski
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In his recent paper Hatherley discusses four reasons given to support mandatory disclosure of the use of machine learning technologies in healthcare, and provides counters to each of these reasons. While I agree with Hatherley's conclusion that such disclosures should not be mandatory (at least not in an upfront fashion), I raise some problems with his counters to the materiality argument. Finally, I raise another potential problem that exists in a democratic society: that even if Hatherley's (and other authors who share his conclusions) arguments are sound, in a democratic society the simple fact that most people might wish for such disclosures to be made might be an enough compelling reason to make such disclosures mandatory.

Journal of Medical EthicsVol. 51(8)
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (GB), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), University of Manchester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Materiality and practicality: a response to - are clinicians ethically obligated to disclose their use of medical machine learning systems to patients? — Michal Pruski · Journal of Medical Ethics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS