How residents and volcanoes co-produce risk knowledge: Ways of knowing and affective attunement to the rhythms of Lonquimay volcano, Chile

In this paper, we present our understanding of the importance of affects in people's sense-making of volcanic risk in everyday life. In doing so, we explore how local knowledge on volcanism is produced and circulated through communities' ongoing affective encounters with volcanoes. Through ethnographic fieldwork and semi-structured interviews, we draw on the heterogeneous experiences and narratives of Malalcahuello residents living next to the Lonquimay volcanic complex in the Southern Andes of Chile. Its last eruption in 1988–1990 formed a new cone on the NE flank, called Navidad ( Christmas ), which has allowed residents to experience active volcanism in a twofold sense: being affected by its impacts during the eruption, and responding affectively to the volcano in everyday life. The results pave the way for a typology of affect-based ways of knowing volcanism. These are constituted by multiple people's viewpoints: 1) knowing the ground, 2) knowing the territory, 3) knowing the risk, and 4) knowing the behaviour. These ways of knowing vary according to, and are in part determined by, the different rhythms of the volcano itself. Therefore, active volcanism becomes a more-than-human agent of knowledge through its rhythmic presence in people's everyday lives. Over time, the local population has become affectively attuned to both ‘hazardous situations’ related to volcanic eruption and ‘risk and safe situations’ during volcanic quiescence. These attributes of human-volcano encounters turn hazardous spaces into affect-laden spaces at different times, raising the need to rethink spatio-temporal dimensions in knowledge dialogue and disaster risk reduction. Overall, the paper underlines the importance of affect-oriented risk research in Chile and worldwide to account for the pre-existent viewpoints from which a volcano is at the heart of people's concerns. • Local communities produce forms of knowledge through their affective encounter with volcanoes. • These ways of knowing comprise the entanglement of knowledge, practices, beliefs, and emotions. • Knowledge and emotional evocations co-emerge rhythmically when interacting with volcanoes. • Volcanic affects are pivotal in the community's awareness of volcanic risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2024.108180
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How residents and volcanoes co-produce risk knowledge: Ways of knowing and affective attunement to the rhythms of Lonquimay volcano, Chile

Jorge E. Romero, Nathaniel O’Grady, Rory Walshe, Carla Marchant et al.
11 citations
Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research
Disaster Management and Resilience
12.45
article

How residents and volcanoes co-produce risk knowledge: Ways of knowing and affective attunement to the rhythms of Lonquimay volcano, Chile

Jorge E. Romero, Nathaniel O’Grady, Rory Walshe, Carla Marchant, Julie Morin, Aurora Fredriksen, Amy Donovan, Francisca Vergara‐Pinto, Malena Szlam
article en
11 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we present our understanding of the importance of affects in people's sense-making of volcanic risk in everyday life. In doing so, we explore how local knowledge on volcanism is produced and circulated through communities' ongoing affective encounters with volcanoes. Through ethnographic fieldwork and semi-structured interviews, we draw on the heterogeneous experiences and narratives of Malalcahuello residents living next to the Lonquimay volcanic complex in the Southern Andes of Chile. Its last eruption in 1988–1990 formed a new cone on the NE flank, called Navidad ( Christmas ), which has allowed residents to experience active volcanism in a twofold sense: being affected by its impacts during the eruption, and responding affectively to the volcano in everyday life. The results pave the way for a typology of affect-based ways of knowing volcanism. These are constituted by multiple people's viewpoints: 1) knowing the ground, 2) knowing the territory, 3) knowing the risk, and 4) knowing the behaviour. These ways of knowing vary according to, and are in part determined by, the different rhythms of the volcano itself. Therefore, active volcanism becomes a more-than-human agent of knowledge through its rhythmic presence in people's everyday lives. Over time, the local population has become affectively attuned to both ‘hazardous situations’ related to volcanic eruption and ‘risk and safe situations’ during volcanic quiescence. These attributes of human-volcano encounters turn hazardous spaces into affect-laden spaces at different times, raising the need to rethink spatio-temporal dimensions in knowledge dialogue and disaster risk reduction. Overall, the paper underlines the importance of affect-oriented risk research in Chile and worldwide to account for the pre-existent viewpoints from which a volcano is at the heart of people's concerns. • Local communities produce forms of knowledge through their affective encounter with volcanoes. • These ways of knowing comprise the entanglement of knowledge, practices, beliefs, and emotions. • Knowledge and emotional evocations co-emerge rhythmically when interacting with volcanoes. • Volcanic affects are pivotal in the community's awareness of volcanic risk.

Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal ResearchVol. 454
Austral University of Chile (CL), University of Cambridge (GB), University of Manchester (GB), University of Art and Social Sciences (CL), Institute for Conflict Research (GB), University of O'Higgins (CL), Center for Climate and Resilience Research (CL)
University of Manchester
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Disaster Management and Resilience
12.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.