Methodological rigor and quality of reporting of clinical trials published with physical activity interventions: A report from the Strengthening the Evidence in Exercise Sciences Initiative (SEES Initiative)

In summary, while critical analysis aspects were more comprehensively described, aspects associated with transparency, such as protocol registrations/modifications and intervention descriptions, were reported suboptimally. The findings underscore the importance of promoting resources related to reporting quality and transparent research practices for investigators and editors in the exercise sciences discipline.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309087
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodological rigor and quality of reporting of clinical trials published with physical activity interventions: A report from the Strengthening the Evidence in Exercise Sciences Initiative (SEES Initiative)

Angélica Trevisan De Nardi, Marcelo Rodrigues dos Santos, Lucas Helal, Douglas dos Santos Soares et al.
3 citations
PLoS ONE
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
1.38
article

Methodological rigor and quality of reporting of clinical trials published with physical activity interventions: A report from the Strengthening the Evidence in Exercise Sciences Initiative (SEES Initiative)

Angélica Trevisan De Nardi, Marcelo Rodrigues dos Santos, Lucas Helal, Douglas dos Santos Soares, Nórton Luís Oliveira, Tainá Silveira Alano, Daniel Umpierre, Leony Morgana Galliano, Larissa Xavier Neves da Silva, Andresa Conrado Ignacio, Jayne Feter
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In summary, while critical analysis aspects were more comprehensively described, aspects associated with transparency, such as protocol registrations/modifications and intervention descriptions, were reported suboptimally. The findings underscore the importance of promoting resources related to reporting quality and transparent research practices for investigators and editors in the exercise sciences discipline.

PLoS ONEVol. 19(8)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (BR), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (BR), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (BR), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
1.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Methodological rigor and quality of reporting of clinical trials published with physical activity interventions: A report from the Strengthening the Evidence in Exercise Sciences Initiative (SEES Initiative) — Angélica Trevisan De Nardi, Marcelo Rodrigues dos Santos, et al. · PLoS ONE (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS