Comparative study of hydro-mechanical behaviors of compacted bentonite powder and granular bentonite

In the deep geological disposal repository of high-level radioactive waste, buffer/backfill materials typically consist of compacted bentonite block and granular bentonite. As these materials undergo a long-term hydration, it is anticipated that the two forms of bentonite materials (i.e. compacted bentonite powder (CBP) and granular bentonite (GB)) are expected to exhibit differing hydro-mechanical behaviors due to the differences in their structures. This work aims to investigate the differences in swelling pressure and compressibility through a series of swelling pressure tests, compression tests and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) tests. The experimental results demonstrated that swelling pressure curves of the CBP specimens showed higher first peak values and more pronounced collapse than those of the GB specimens at a given dry density, regardless of vapor-water hydration or liquid-water hydration. The final swelling pressures of the two materials were similar at the same dry density, suggesting an independent correlation between swelling pressure and dry density. At the high suction range, the compression curves exhibited an obvious bi-linear pattern for the CBP specimens and a significant nonlinearity for the GB specimens. Meanwhile, the CBP specimens presented higher pre-consolidation pressures and larger compression indices than the GB specimens at a given suction. As suction decreased, the compression curves of the two materials gradually approached each other and their differences were reduced accordingly. After reaching saturation, a good consistency between them was observed whether for final swelling pressure or compressibility. Pore structure analysis revealed that the two materials both presented an initially double structure, and their differences were primarily manifested at the macrostructural level. Eventually, the differences in swelling pressure or compression curves of the two materials were well interpreted by combining microstructural evolutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.05.034
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study of hydro-mechanical behaviors of compacted bentonite powder and granular bentonite

Yong-Gui Chen, Yong He, Wei Su, Qiong Wang et al.
5 citations
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
1.30
article

Comparative study of hydro-mechanical behaviors of compacted bentonite powder and granular bentonite

Yong-Gui Chen, Yong He, Wei Su, Qiong Wang, Weimin Ye, Zhao Zhang, Wen-Sheng Geng
article en
5 citations

Abstract

In the deep geological disposal repository of high-level radioactive waste, buffer/backfill materials typically consist of compacted bentonite block and granular bentonite. As these materials undergo a long-term hydration, it is anticipated that the two forms of bentonite materials (i.e. compacted bentonite powder (CBP) and granular bentonite (GB)) are expected to exhibit differing hydro-mechanical behaviors due to the differences in their structures. This work aims to investigate the differences in swelling pressure and compressibility through a series of swelling pressure tests, compression tests and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) tests. The experimental results demonstrated that swelling pressure curves of the CBP specimens showed higher first peak values and more pronounced collapse than those of the GB specimens at a given dry density, regardless of vapor-water hydration or liquid-water hydration. The final swelling pressures of the two materials were similar at the same dry density, suggesting an independent correlation between swelling pressure and dry density. At the high suction range, the compression curves exhibited an obvious bi-linear pattern for the CBP specimens and a significant nonlinearity for the GB specimens. Meanwhile, the CBP specimens presented higher pre-consolidation pressures and larger compression indices than the GB specimens at a given suction. As suction decreased, the compression curves of the two materials gradually approached each other and their differences were reduced accordingly. After reaching saturation, a good consistency between them was observed whether for final swelling pressure or compressibility. Pore structure analysis revealed that the two materials both presented an initially double structure, and their differences were primarily manifested at the macrostructural level. Eventually, the differences in swelling pressure or compression curves of the two materials were well interpreted by combining microstructural evolutions.

Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical EngineeringVol. 17(3)
Tongji University (CN), Central South University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.