A Bayesian Framework for Modelling the Trust Relationships to Group Decision Making Problems

In traditional social network analysis-based group decision-making problems, decision makers (DMs) commonly establish trust relationships with unfamiliar DMs based on the transitivity of trust but always ignore the effectiveness of such indirect trust and the potential risks that may arise from excessive trust/distrust. To overcome this limitation, this paper explores a Bayesian framework to construct trust relationships among a group which can update the direct trusts between DMs by considering the trusts to the trustee from other DMs trusted by the original trustor. The Bayesian trust relationship can not only supplement the incomplete trust relationships based on known trust information, but also make reasonable adjustments to existing trusts before the decision process. And it has been proven to be effective in mitigating inaccuracies in decision outcomes resulting from either excessive trust or distrust, and in reducing information loss caused by excessively long paths during trust transition. Relatedly, after giving the algorithm of the Bayesian trust relationship, the rank discrepancy between DMs is defined in uncertain belief distribution environment to measure and constrain the trust decision indicator (TDI) in the Bayesian framework. Then, constrained by expected rank discrepancy, the stochastic TDI analysis is introduced to derive the confidence weight intervals of DMs. And an optimization model is provided to maximize the group consensus within the constraints of the generated interval weights. Finally, a case study of new energy vehicles selection is presented. Additionally, both comparative study and sensitivity analysis are provided.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tfuzz.2024.3452271
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Bayesian Framework for Modelling the Trust Relationships to Group Decision Making Problems

Ligang Zhou, Xianchao Dai, Qun Wu, Muhammet Deveci et al.
9 citations
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
Team Dynamics and Performance
5.79
article

A Bayesian Framework for Modelling the Trust Relationships to Group Decision Making Problems

Ligang Zhou, Xianchao Dai, Qun Wu, Muhammet Deveci, Weiping Ding, Hao Li
article en
9 citations

Abstract

In traditional social network analysis-based group decision-making problems, decision makers (DMs) commonly establish trust relationships with unfamiliar DMs based on the transitivity of trust but always ignore the effectiveness of such indirect trust and the potential risks that may arise from excessive trust/distrust. To overcome this limitation, this paper explores a Bayesian framework to construct trust relationships among a group which can update the direct trusts between DMs by considering the trusts to the trustee from other DMs trusted by the original trustor. The Bayesian trust relationship can not only supplement the incomplete trust relationships based on known trust information, but also make reasonable adjustments to existing trusts before the decision process. And it has been proven to be effective in mitigating inaccuracies in decision outcomes resulting from either excessive trust or distrust, and in reducing information loss caused by excessively long paths during trust transition. Relatedly, after giving the algorithm of the Bayesian trust relationship, the rank discrepancy between DMs is defined in uncertain belief distribution environment to measure and constrain the trust decision indicator (TDI) in the Bayesian framework. Then, constrained by expected rank discrepancy, the stochastic TDI analysis is introduced to derive the confidence weight intervals of DMs. And an optimization model is provided to maximize the group consensus within the constraints of the generated interval weights. Finally, a case study of new energy vehicles selection is presented. Additionally, both comparative study and sensitivity analysis are provided.

IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy SystemsVol. 32(12)
Anhui University (CN), Naval Academy (TR), Nantong University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Team Dynamics and Performance
5.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.