Statistical analysis of low-density and high-density polyethylene modified asphalt mixes using the response surface method

The common use of plastics in daily life has engendered gigantic amounts of waste plastics, which have a detrimental influence on the environment. Researchers have proposed several strategies for the recycling of waste plastics and their products. Among these, one strategy is to use them in the construction industry, particularly in asphaltic pavements. This study thus focused on the utilization of waste plastics, specifically Low-Density Polyethylene (LDPE) and High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE), as an additive in Asphalt Concrete (AC) mixes. Indirect Tensile Strength (ITS), Flow Time (FT), and Dynamic Modulus (DM) tests were used to investigate the moisture damage, permanent deformation, fatigue performance, and DM of the LDPE and HDPE modified AC mixes. According to the laboratory test results, the LDPE and HDPE modified AC mixes offer more resistance to moisture damage compared to the Control AC mixes. It was also concluded that asphalt mixes modified with the LDPE and HDPE attained 2.07 times and 1.26 times superior resistance to permanent deformation than the Control mixes. Furthermore, the LDPE and HDPE modified AC mixes outperformed the DM values of the Control mixes by 2.06 times and 1.41 times, respectively. In addition, it was determined that the LDPE and HDPE modified AC mixes exhibit 1.72 times and 1.39 times greater fatigue parameter values than their counterpart, suggesting superior fatigue resistance performance. The statistical models developed using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) revealed the highest values of the Coefficient of Determination (>0.80), adequate precision (>4.0), and lack-of-fit tests, indicating the model’s adequacy for predicting the response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03697
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Statistical analysis of low-density and high-density polyethylene modified asphalt mixes using the response surface method

Mohammed Alamri, Muhammad Junaid, Ahmed Eltwati, Diyar Khan et al.
14 citations
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
3.65
article

Statistical analysis of low-density and high-density polyethylene modified asphalt mixes using the response surface method

Mohammed Alamri, Muhammad Junaid, Ahmed Eltwati, Diyar Khan, Chaozhe Jiang, M. S. Eisa
article en
14 citations

Abstract

The common use of plastics in daily life has engendered gigantic amounts of waste plastics, which have a detrimental influence on the environment. Researchers have proposed several strategies for the recycling of waste plastics and their products. Among these, one strategy is to use them in the construction industry, particularly in asphaltic pavements. This study thus focused on the utilization of waste plastics, specifically Low-Density Polyethylene (LDPE) and High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE), as an additive in Asphalt Concrete (AC) mixes. Indirect Tensile Strength (ITS), Flow Time (FT), and Dynamic Modulus (DM) tests were used to investigate the moisture damage, permanent deformation, fatigue performance, and DM of the LDPE and HDPE modified AC mixes. According to the laboratory test results, the LDPE and HDPE modified AC mixes offer more resistance to moisture damage compared to the Control AC mixes. It was also concluded that asphalt mixes modified with the LDPE and HDPE attained 2.07 times and 1.26 times superior resistance to permanent deformation than the Control mixes. Furthermore, the LDPE and HDPE modified AC mixes outperformed the DM values of the Control mixes by 2.06 times and 1.41 times, respectively. In addition, it was determined that the LDPE and HDPE modified AC mixes exhibit 1.72 times and 1.39 times greater fatigue parameter values than their counterpart, suggesting superior fatigue resistance performance. The statistical models developed using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) revealed the highest values of the Coefficient of Determination (>0.80), adequate precision (>4.0), and lack-of-fit tests, indicating the model’s adequacy for predicting the response.

Case Studies in Construction MaterialsVol. 21
Silesian University of Technology (PL), Benha University (EG), King Saud University (SA), University of Benghazi (LY), Southwest Jiaotong University (CN)
King Saud University
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
3.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.