Disturbance and ecosystem management interact to shape reptile body condition

Abstract Fire, invasive predators and low rainfall are key disturbances that interact to negatively impact wildlife. Reptiles are a highly threatened group, yet they have rarely been the focus of threat interaction research. Research assessing the impacts of disturbance on wildlife have typically focussed on changes in species richness and abundance. However, these metrics largely overlook the non‐lethal effects on individuals and populations persisting within disturbed landscapes. Body condition is an individual‐level response metric that is easily obtainable and provides insight into the cumulative behavioural and morphological changes within a population. We used a landscape‐scale natural experiment in southern Australia to investigate the impacts of prescribed fire severity, invasive red fox ( Vulpes vulpes ) control, low rainfall conditions and their interactive effects on reptile body condition. Low rainfall had pervasive negative effects on body condition, while prescribed fire had negative effects on the larger, viviparous species. We found a three‐way interactive effect, whereby the negative effects of fire and low rainfall were greater in areas where red foxes were controlled. These results indicate that there are complex ecological interactions at play, potentially including intra‐specific competition and interspecific interactions. Lower body condition in disturbed environments could have lasting implications for individual fitness and population persistence. For instance, species with lower body condition one‐year post‐fire could be more vulnerable to another fire event, compared to species that are able to maintain condition in post‐fire landscapes. With reptile body condition lower in a drier year, we advise minimising additional disturbance (e.g. avoid prescribed fires) during low rainfall years and drought periods. Along with research into ecological interactions, understanding how body condition indices relate to altered fitness is a priority knowledge gap. Such research could improve the ability to predict how species and populations will respond to future disturbances, a key challenge in wildlife disturbance research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Conservation
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12983
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disturbance and ecosystem management interact to shape reptile body condition

Tim S. Doherty, Kristina J. Macdonald, Don A. Driscoll, Bronwyn A. Hradsky
2 citations
Animal Conservation
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
1.38
article

Disturbance and ecosystem management interact to shape reptile body condition

Tim S. Doherty, Kristina J. Macdonald, Don A. Driscoll, Bronwyn A. Hradsky
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Fire, invasive predators and low rainfall are key disturbances that interact to negatively impact wildlife. Reptiles are a highly threatened group, yet they have rarely been the focus of threat interaction research. Research assessing the impacts of disturbance on wildlife have typically focussed on changes in species richness and abundance. However, these metrics largely overlook the non‐lethal effects on individuals and populations persisting within disturbed landscapes. Body condition is an individual‐level response metric that is easily obtainable and provides insight into the cumulative behavioural and morphological changes within a population. We used a landscape‐scale natural experiment in southern Australia to investigate the impacts of prescribed fire severity, invasive red fox ( Vulpes vulpes ) control, low rainfall conditions and their interactive effects on reptile body condition. Low rainfall had pervasive negative effects on body condition, while prescribed fire had negative effects on the larger, viviparous species. We found a three‐way interactive effect, whereby the negative effects of fire and low rainfall were greater in areas where red foxes were controlled. These results indicate that there are complex ecological interactions at play, potentially including intra‐specific competition and interspecific interactions. Lower body condition in disturbed environments could have lasting implications for individual fitness and population persistence. For instance, species with lower body condition one‐year post‐fire could be more vulnerable to another fire event, compared to species that are able to maintain condition in post‐fire landscapes. With reptile body condition lower in a drier year, we advise minimising additional disturbance (e.g. avoid prescribed fires) during low rainfall years and drought periods. Along with research into ecological interactions, understanding how body condition indices relate to altered fitness is a priority knowledge gap. Such research could improve the ability to predict how species and populations will respond to future disturbances, a key challenge in wildlife disturbance research.

Animal ConservationVol. 28(2)
The University of Sydney (AU), Deakin University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Charles Darwin University (AU), Ecosystem Sciences (AU)
U.S. Department of Energy, Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment, Parks Victoria, Ecological Society of America, Australian Government, Equity Trustees, Deakin University, Ecological Society of Australia, Australian Research Council
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
1.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.