Modeling interfacial tension of methane-brine systems at high pressure high temperature conditions

In the present study, two white-box correlative models, namely gene expression programming (GEP) and group method of data handling (GMDH), were implemented to predict the interfacial tension (IFT) of brine-methane system. To achieve this, 790 data points were collected from literature, with pressure, temperature, and salinity as inputs and IFT as the output. The range of salinity, pressure, and temperature is from 0 to 107000 ppm, 0.01–260 MPa, and 278.1–477.59 K, respectively. The results show that the GMDH model with an R 2 of 0.9321 and an average absolute percent relative error (AAPRE) of 3.68% outperforms the GEP, which has an AAPRE of 5.08% and an R 2 of 0.8943. Based on our investigation, GMDH and GEP models follow the expected trend of IFT with the variation of pressure. It has been found that the GMDH model exhibits better performance compared to the previously developed correlations in the literature. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis indicated that temperature has the greatest effect on IFT. By using the leverage approach, we proved that the GMDH model is statistically valid. • GMDH and GEP, predicted IFT in methane-brine systems for petroleum and chemical processes. • Pressure, temperature, and salinity were inputs to develop the models. • GMDH demonstrated superior performance and AAPRE outperformed the GEP model. • Temperature was found the most influential factor on IFT in industrial applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoenergy Science and Engineering
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213258
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling interfacial tension of methane-brine systems at high pressure high temperature conditions

Hossein Mehrjoo, Abdolhossein Hemmati‐Sarapardeh, M.R. Riazi, Mehdi Ostadhassan et al.
4 citations
Geoenergy Science and Engineering
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
1.08
article

Modeling interfacial tension of methane-brine systems at high pressure high temperature conditions

Hossein Mehrjoo, Abdolhossein Hemmati‐Sarapardeh, M.R. Riazi, Mehdi Ostadhassan, Farzaneh Rezaei
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In the present study, two white-box correlative models, namely gene expression programming (GEP) and group method of data handling (GMDH), were implemented to predict the interfacial tension (IFT) of brine-methane system. To achieve this, 790 data points were collected from literature, with pressure, temperature, and salinity as inputs and IFT as the output. The range of salinity, pressure, and temperature is from 0 to 107000 ppm, 0.01–260 MPa, and 278.1–477.59 K, respectively. The results show that the GMDH model with an R 2 of 0.9321 and an average absolute percent relative error (AAPRE) of 3.68% outperforms the GEP, which has an AAPRE of 5.08% and an R 2 of 0.8943. Based on our investigation, GMDH and GEP models follow the expected trend of IFT with the variation of pressure. It has been found that the GMDH model exhibits better performance compared to the previously developed correlations in the literature. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis indicated that temperature has the greatest effect on IFT. By using the leverage approach, we proved that the GMDH model is statistically valid. • GMDH and GEP, predicted IFT in methane-brine systems for petroleum and chemical processes. • Pressure, temperature, and salinity were inputs to develop the models. • GMDH demonstrated superior performance and AAPRE outperformed the GEP model. • Temperature was found the most influential factor on IFT in industrial applications.

Geoenergy Science and EngineeringVol. 242
Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman (IR), Amirkabir University of Technology (IR), Shiraz University (IR), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
1.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.