Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of the composite prefabricated ultra-shallow slabs (PUSS) and hollow core slabs in the UK

Life cycle assessment studies of precast construction methods highlight their superiority over traditional cast-in-situ construction in reducing buildings’ environmental impacts. Among the extensively used precast structural elements, hollow core precast slabs have proven benefits with their practical implementation in flooring systems across various flooring spans and live loads. This paper presents a case study comparing the global warming potential and embodied energy impacts of a recently developed lightweight prefabricated composite flooring system (PUSS) with zinghollow core precast slabs in the UK. The analysis is based on 16 live load/flooring span scenarios, between 6 and 12m. The study examines the benefits and drawbacks of utilising different concrete types in PUSS flooring, namely normal weight concrete, lightweight aggregates concrete and geopolymer concrete. PUSS with GPC demonstrates potential savings of up to 50 % in GWP compared with hollow core slabs, while PUSS with LWC exhibits potential savings of up to 35 % in total EE compared with hollow core slabs. • LCA comparative study of carbon emissions and embodied energy of prefabricated floorings. • Sensitivity analyses highlight the impact of transportation and recycling approach variability. • PUSS has superior environmental advantages compared to precast hollow core slabs. • PUSS with LWC excels in EE reduction, while PUSS with GPC leads in GWP reduction. • PUSS with lightweight concrete is a promising environmental friendly flooring solution.