Defying the flat-Earth myth: Soil organic carbon monitoring in topographically complex temperate pasture landscapes

• Topographical complex landscapes challenge sampling designs for soil organic carbon. • We explored the vertical, spatial and temporal distribution of soil organic carbon. • Fit-for-purpose methods were applied to capture soil organic carbon variability. • Hybrid methods captured spatial and temporal variability of soil organic carbon. • More pragmatism is required to monitor soil organic carbon for integrated farm plan. Soil sampling design to capture the spatiotemporal variability of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in complex landscapes is challenged by the influence of topographical features on primary production, animal behaviour, and carbon and nutrient return to grasslands. Here we explore a range of approaches for streamlining the sampling process using measures of SOC stock data (2003, 2020, 2021) from a long-term hill-country fertilizer experiment. The stepwise procedure included a) evaluation of sampling efficiency between stratified and random soil sampling designs to capture spatial variability of SOC stocks, b) semi-parametric regression analysis to evaluate the representativeness of certain strata (e.g. medium slopes), c) exploring the appropriateness of using shallow SOC stock estimates to represent the full sampling depth, and d) the use of a process-based model to determine expected SOC stock changes and temporal variability to estimate the number of representative soil samples required to achieve a significant minimum change. Our analyses suggest that a) the stratified sampling design was more efficient reflected in the number of samples required to identify 5 % deviation in SOC stocks, b) estimates obtained on the medium slope were a reasonable approximation of the SOC stocks and its spatial variation across the farmlets, c) shallow (0–75 mm) SOC stock estimates from an adjusted regression model offered an accurate inference of its vertical distribution (0–300 mm), and d) the Grass-NEXT model provided insights on where more intensive sampling is required to detect a significant minimum change in SOC stocks over time. Tailored, stratified soil sampling and context-specific strategies, such as using representative strata and shallow sampling as effective steps for estimating SOC stocks and addressing data gaps, are crucial for simplifying monitoring and minimizing the cost of on-farm soil sampling designs in topographically complex landscapes covered by long-term pastures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CATENA
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2024.108348
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defying the flat-Earth myth: Soil organic carbon monitoring in topographically complex temperate pasture landscapes

Ronaldo Vibart, Franco Bilotto, Matthew Tom Harrison, A. D. Mackay et al.
1 citations
CATENA
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
0.33
article

Defying the flat-Earth myth: Soil organic carbon monitoring in topographically complex temperate pasture landscapes

Ronaldo Vibart, Franco Bilotto, Matthew Tom Harrison, A. D. Mackay, B.P. Devantier, Emma Noakes, Zachary Dewhurst, Dongwen Luo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Topographical complex landscapes challenge sampling designs for soil organic carbon. • We explored the vertical, spatial and temporal distribution of soil organic carbon. • Fit-for-purpose methods were applied to capture soil organic carbon variability. • Hybrid methods captured spatial and temporal variability of soil organic carbon. • More pragmatism is required to monitor soil organic carbon for integrated farm plan. Soil sampling design to capture the spatiotemporal variability of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in complex landscapes is challenged by the influence of topographical features on primary production, animal behaviour, and carbon and nutrient return to grasslands. Here we explore a range of approaches for streamlining the sampling process using measures of SOC stock data (2003, 2020, 2021) from a long-term hill-country fertilizer experiment. The stepwise procedure included a) evaluation of sampling efficiency between stratified and random soil sampling designs to capture spatial variability of SOC stocks, b) semi-parametric regression analysis to evaluate the representativeness of certain strata (e.g. medium slopes), c) exploring the appropriateness of using shallow SOC stock estimates to represent the full sampling depth, and d) the use of a process-based model to determine expected SOC stock changes and temporal variability to estimate the number of representative soil samples required to achieve a significant minimum change. Our analyses suggest that a) the stratified sampling design was more efficient reflected in the number of samples required to identify 5 % deviation in SOC stocks, b) estimates obtained on the medium slope were a reasonable approximation of the SOC stocks and its spatial variation across the farmlets, c) shallow (0–75 mm) SOC stock estimates from an adjusted regression model offered an accurate inference of its vertical distribution (0–300 mm), and d) the Grass-NEXT model provided insights on where more intensive sampling is required to detect a significant minimum change in SOC stocks over time. Tailored, stratified soil sampling and context-specific strategies, such as using representative strata and shallow sampling as effective steps for estimating SOC stocks and addressing data gaps, are crucial for simplifying monitoring and minimizing the cost of on-farm soil sampling designs in topographically complex landscapes covered by long-term pastures.

CATENAVol. 245
University of Tasmania (AU), Cornell University (US), AgResearch (NZ), New York State College of Agriculture & Life Sciences (US)
Meat and Livestock Australia, University of Tasmania, Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.