Improving the Estimation Method of Subsurface Shale Gas Capacities Based on the Amankwah Model

Accurately evaluating the in situ gas content of shale is a crucial step in achieving effective exploration and optimizing exploitation strategies, which holds significant importance for understanding resource enrichment patterns and enhancing resource utilization efficiency. In order to achieve precise evaluation of shale gas volume, a new approach for estimating in situ shale gas content based on the London dispersion potential and Polanyi adsorption potential has been optimized. Comprehensive analyses were performed on shale cores from the Shanxi Formation at 3153.03 m in the Ordos Basin, including helium-based porosity measurements, high-pressure methane adsorption isotherms, on-site canister desorption tests, and gas composition analysis. Combining the previously analyzed shale (at 1264.42 m), the modified Polanyi–London (PL) method and three previous methods were employed to calculate the on-site shale gas volume. The results indicate that the gas contents obtained by the direct and indirect methods are significantly lower than those obtained by the PL method and modified PL method, which is due to the notable uncertainties associated with the former two methods. At greater burial depths, the difference in gas content obtained by the PL method and modified PL method is larger than that at shallower burial depths, and this difference depends on the suitability of the Amankwah model used by the latter, compared to the Antoine model used by the former, for the supercritical state of gas. The modified PL method is underpinned by an established theoretical framework. Upon comparison with the other four methods, the results obtained using the modified PL method appear more perfect, and the results are more reasonable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy & Fuels
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c03148
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving the Estimation Method of Subsurface Shale Gas Capacities Based on the Amankwah Model

Hexin Huang, Rongxi Li, Zhenxue Jiang, Tian Gao et al.
1 citations
Energy & Fuels
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
0.27
article

Improving the Estimation Method of Subsurface Shale Gas Capacities Based on the Amankwah Model

Hexin Huang, Rongxi Li, Zhenxue Jiang, Tian Gao, Lei Chen, Xiaoli Zhai, Wentao Yao, Yaxuan Ma
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Accurately evaluating the in situ gas content of shale is a crucial step in achieving effective exploration and optimizing exploitation strategies, which holds significant importance for understanding resource enrichment patterns and enhancing resource utilization efficiency. In order to achieve precise evaluation of shale gas volume, a new approach for estimating in situ shale gas content based on the London dispersion potential and Polanyi adsorption potential has been optimized. Comprehensive analyses were performed on shale cores from the Shanxi Formation at 3153.03 m in the Ordos Basin, including helium-based porosity measurements, high-pressure methane adsorption isotherms, on-site canister desorption tests, and gas composition analysis. Combining the previously analyzed shale (at 1264.42 m), the modified Polanyi–London (PL) method and three previous methods were employed to calculate the on-site shale gas volume. The results indicate that the gas contents obtained by the direct and indirect methods are significantly lower than those obtained by the PL method and modified PL method, which is due to the notable uncertainties associated with the former two methods. At greater burial depths, the difference in gas content obtained by the PL method and modified PL method is larger than that at shallower burial depths, and this difference depends on the suitability of the Amankwah model used by the latter, compared to the Antoine model used by the former, for the supercritical state of gas. The modified PL method is underpinned by an established theoretical framework. Upon comparison with the other four methods, the results obtained using the modified PL method appear more perfect, and the results are more reasonable.

Energy & FuelsVol. 38(18)
China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), Chang'an University (CN), China University of Petroleum, East China (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
0.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.