Applying mark-resight, count, and telemetry data to estimate effective sampling area and fish density with stationary underwater cameras

Accurate estimates of abundance and density for geographically open populations must account for the effective sampling area (ESA) of sampling gears. We describe a Marked N-Mixture model to estimate ESA and density (number of individuals/unit area) from repeated counts of unmarked and marked individuals, integrating mark-resight, camera counts, and telemetry data of red snapper ( Lutjanus campechanus) at a 1.6 km 2 reef off North Carolina, USA. Cameras recorded observations of unmarked and marked individuals, whereas telemetry data indicated the number of tagged fish present on the reef. We estimated density (95 individuals/km 2 , 95%CI: 58–149), ESA (which was lower when current direction was towards the camera), detection probability (0.06, 95%CI: 0.03–0.09), and covariate relationships. Simulation studies under different scenarios of data quality and space use identified positive bias in density estimates from N-mixture models due to fish movement. In contrast, the Marked N-Mixture model returned unbiased estimates of density, ESA, and detection parameters, and appears to be a more robust method for modeling density given the data available for this analysis. This approach can be applied to other populations where count and telemetry data overlap in space and time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2023-0373
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying mark-resight, count, and telemetry data to estimate effective sampling area and fish density with stationary underwater cameras

Nathan J. Hostetter, William F. Patterson, Viviane Zulian, Kyle W. Shertzer et al.
3 citations
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
0.60
article

Applying mark-resight, count, and telemetry data to estimate effective sampling area and fish density with stationary underwater cameras

Nathan J. Hostetter, William F. Patterson, Viviane Zulian, Kyle W. Shertzer, Nathan M. Bacheler, Brian J. Reich, Krishna Pacifici, Jeffrey A. Buckel
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Accurate estimates of abundance and density for geographically open populations must account for the effective sampling area (ESA) of sampling gears. We describe a Marked N-Mixture model to estimate ESA and density (number of individuals/unit area) from repeated counts of unmarked and marked individuals, integrating mark-resight, camera counts, and telemetry data of red snapper ( Lutjanus campechanus) at a 1.6 km 2 reef off North Carolina, USA. Cameras recorded observations of unmarked and marked individuals, whereas telemetry data indicated the number of tagged fish present on the reef. We estimated density (95 individuals/km 2 , 95%CI: 58–149), ESA (which was lower when current direction was towards the camera), detection probability (0.06, 95%CI: 0.03–0.09), and covariate relationships. Simulation studies under different scenarios of data quality and space use identified positive bias in density estimates from N-mixture models due to fish movement. In contrast, the Marked N-Mixture model returned unbiased estimates of density, ESA, and detection parameters, and appears to be a more robust method for modeling density given the data available for this analysis. This approach can be applied to other populations where count and telemetry data overlap in space and time.

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesVol. 82
NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US), United States Geological Survey (US), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US), North Carolina State University (US), University of Florida (US), NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center (US), Morehead State University (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
0.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.