Challenges and opportunities of recovering lithium from seawater, produced water, geothermal brines, and salt lakes using conventional and emerging technologies

• Lithium supply challenges prompt reevaluation of sourcing strategies. • Technological bottlenecks of different lithium extraction techniques are identified. • The effectiveness of lithium extraction technologies is assessed across different feedstocks. • Integration of mature and emerging technologies would enhance lithium recovery. • Chemical precipitation has the highest operational cost compared to other technologies. Energy storage plays a crucial role in the modern energy landscape, with its applications spanning from renewable energy integration to the electrification of transportation and microgrids. Lithium is a key component of lithium-ion batteries at the core of energy storage technologies. Increasing demand for lithium has challenged supply chains and required a rethinking of how we source it. This comprehensive review presents a critical and holistic assessment of the opportunities and challenges of sourcing lithium from diverse feedstocks, such as seawater, geothermal, produced water (oilfield), and salt lake brines. We assess various lithium extraction technologies (precipitation, extraction, electrochemical techniques, and membrane processes) considering these three feedstocks. A quantitative comparative analysis is conducted across all technologies, considering factors such as cost, commercial maturity, operation duration, and other relevant parameters to determine the most promising technologies for each feedstock while identifying remaining research and technological gaps. Our analysis reveals that Direct Lithium Extraction (DLE) technologies, characterized by higher selectivity and lower environmental impact, demonstrate significant promise for enhancing lithium yields from geothermal brines. In contrast, membrane processes are identified as more suited for seawater and salt lake brines, offering cost-effective scalability despite challenges with selectivity and membrane fouling. Ultimately, the efficient integration of these technologies is illustrated for harvesting lithium from each unconventional resource. The analysis shows that adsorption and chemical precipitation are the commercial technologies for lithium recovery from geothermal, salt lake, and oilfield brine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Engineering Journal
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.155349
Citations
99
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges and opportunities of recovering lithium from seawater, produced water, geothermal brines, and salt lakes using conventional and emerging technologies

Hasan Nikkhah, Deniz İpekçi, Zachary Stoll, Jeffrey R. McCutcheon et al.
99 citations
Chemical Engineering Journal
Extraction and Separation Processes
21.04
article

Challenges and opportunities of recovering lithium from seawater, produced water, geothermal brines, and salt lakes using conventional and emerging technologies

Hasan Nikkhah, Deniz İpekçi, Zachary Stoll, Jeffrey R. McCutcheon, Pei Xu, Burcu Beykal, Wenjun Xiang, Baikun Li
article en
99 citations

Abstract

• Lithium supply challenges prompt reevaluation of sourcing strategies. • Technological bottlenecks of different lithium extraction techniques are identified. • The effectiveness of lithium extraction technologies is assessed across different feedstocks. • Integration of mature and emerging technologies would enhance lithium recovery. • Chemical precipitation has the highest operational cost compared to other technologies. Energy storage plays a crucial role in the modern energy landscape, with its applications spanning from renewable energy integration to the electrification of transportation and microgrids. Lithium is a key component of lithium-ion batteries at the core of energy storage technologies. Increasing demand for lithium has challenged supply chains and required a rethinking of how we source it. This comprehensive review presents a critical and holistic assessment of the opportunities and challenges of sourcing lithium from diverse feedstocks, such as seawater, geothermal, produced water (oilfield), and salt lake brines. We assess various lithium extraction technologies (precipitation, extraction, electrochemical techniques, and membrane processes) considering these three feedstocks. A quantitative comparative analysis is conducted across all technologies, considering factors such as cost, commercial maturity, operation duration, and other relevant parameters to determine the most promising technologies for each feedstock while identifying remaining research and technological gaps. Our analysis reveals that Direct Lithium Extraction (DLE) technologies, characterized by higher selectivity and lower environmental impact, demonstrate significant promise for enhancing lithium yields from geothermal brines. In contrast, membrane processes are identified as more suited for seawater and salt lake brines, offering cost-effective scalability despite challenges with selectivity and membrane fouling. Ultimately, the efficient integration of these technologies is illustrated for harvesting lithium from each unconventional resource. The analysis shows that adsorption and chemical precipitation are the commercial technologies for lithium recovery from geothermal, salt lake, and oilfield brine.

Chemical Engineering JournalVol. 498
New Mexico State University (US), University of Connecticut (US), Clean Energy (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Extraction and Separation Processes
21.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.