Optimization of liquefaction cycles applied to CO2 coming from onshore pipeline to offshore ship transportation

• Open, close and hybrid CO 2 liquefaction cycles. • Energy consumption optimization of liquefaction units. • Impact of impurities on electricity consumption. • Complete analyses considering CO 2 loss, exergy, energy consumption, and cost. • Liquefaction cost between 7 and 14 €/t CO2 depending inlet and outlet impurities. In the field of the CO 2 transportation for the Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) process chain, several analyses show that, for a large-scale CO 2 transportation, pipeline transportation is the preferred method on land due to its lower cost. Barges also present a feasible alternative if the capture site is near a waterway. Maritime transport becomes more advantageous than pipelines, particularly over long distances and across ocean. Despite the need to liquefy CO 2 and to add temporary storage facilities for loading and unloading onto ships, beyond a certain distance at fixed CO 2 transported and plant life, ship transport optimal at pressures of 7 or 15 bar depending on the type of vessel. Impurities in CO 2 , arising from various industrial processes and variable performances of capture technologies, increase energy consumption during compression and could cause corrosion risks. Specifications for CO 2 ship transport limit the concentration of certain impurities with strict thresholds. Methods for purifying CO 2 , such as the two-flash system and stripping column, have been proposed to meet these specifications. The studied CO 2 liquefaction methods show that hybrid cycles, combining open cycle with Joule-Thompson expansion and closed cycle with cooling machine offer reduced energy consumption and improved CO 2 recovery compared to open or closed cycles. In the presence of the maximum threshold of impurities in the pipeline, energy consumption can nearly double from 21.8 kWh/t CO 2 to 40.9 kWh/t CO 2 , with the highest recovery rising 98.1 %. This research underscores the importance of optimizing CO 2 transport strategies to facilitate the deployment of CCUS technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Carbon Capture Science & Technology
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccst.2024.100280
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Offshore Engineering and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of liquefaction cycles applied to CO2 coming from onshore pipeline to offshore ship transportation

Alexis Costa, Lionel Dubois, Diane Thomas, Guy De Weireld
5 citations
Carbon Capture Science & Technology
Offshore Engineering and Technologies
1.68
article

Optimization of liquefaction cycles applied to CO2 coming from onshore pipeline to offshore ship transportation

Alexis Costa, Lionel Dubois, Diane Thomas, Guy De Weireld
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• Open, close and hybrid CO 2 liquefaction cycles. • Energy consumption optimization of liquefaction units. • Impact of impurities on electricity consumption. • Complete analyses considering CO 2 loss, exergy, energy consumption, and cost. • Liquefaction cost between 7 and 14 €/t CO2 depending inlet and outlet impurities. In the field of the CO 2 transportation for the Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) process chain, several analyses show that, for a large-scale CO 2 transportation, pipeline transportation is the preferred method on land due to its lower cost. Barges also present a feasible alternative if the capture site is near a waterway. Maritime transport becomes more advantageous than pipelines, particularly over long distances and across ocean. Despite the need to liquefy CO 2 and to add temporary storage facilities for loading and unloading onto ships, beyond a certain distance at fixed CO 2 transported and plant life, ship transport optimal at pressures of 7 or 15 bar depending on the type of vessel. Impurities in CO 2 , arising from various industrial processes and variable performances of capture technologies, increase energy consumption during compression and could cause corrosion risks. Specifications for CO 2 ship transport limit the concentration of certain impurities with strict thresholds. Methods for purifying CO 2 , such as the two-flash system and stripping column, have been proposed to meet these specifications. The studied CO 2 liquefaction methods show that hybrid cycles, combining open cycle with Joule-Thompson expansion and closed cycle with cooling machine offer reduced energy consumption and improved CO 2 recovery compared to open or closed cycles. In the presence of the maximum threshold of impurities in the pipeline, energy consumption can nearly double from 21.8 kWh/t CO 2 to 40.9 kWh/t CO 2 , with the highest recovery rising 98.1 %. This research underscores the importance of optimizing CO 2 transport strategies to facilitate the deployment of CCUS technologies.

Carbon Capture Science & TechnologyVol. 13
University of Mons (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Offshore Engineering and Technologies
1.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.