Fractionation dose optimization facilities the implementation of transmission proton FLASH-RT

<i>Objective.</i>The beam switching time and fractional dose influence the FLASH effect. A single-beam-per-fraction (SBPF) scheme using uniform fractional dose (UFD) has been proposed for FLASH- radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) to eliminate the beam switching time. Based on SBPF schemes, a fractionation dose optimization algorithm is proposed to optimize non-UFD plans to maximize the fractionation effect and dose-dependent FLASH effect.<i>Approach.</i>The UFD plan, containing five 236 MeV transmission proton beams, was optimized for 11 patients with peripheral lung cancer, with each beam delivering a uniform dose of 11 Gy to the target. Meanwhile, the non-UFD plan was optimized using fractionation dose optimization. To compare the two plans, the equivalent dose to 2 Gy (EQD2) for the target and normal tissues was calculated with an<i>α</i>/<i>β</i>ratio of 10 and 3, respectively. Both UFD and non-UFD plans ensured that the target received an EQD2 of 96.3 Gy. To investigate the overall improvement in normal tissue sparing with the non-UFD plan, the FLASH-enhanced EQD2 was calculated.<i>Main results.</i>The fractional doses in non-UFD plans ranged between 5.0 Gy and 24.2 Gy. No significant differences were found in EQD2<sub>2%</sub>and EQD2<sub>98%</sub>of targets between UFD and non-UFD plans. However, the<i>D</i><sub>95%</sub>of the target in non-UFD plans was significantly reduced by 15.1%. The sparing effect in non-UFD plans was significantly improved. The FLASH-enhanced EQD2<sub>mean</sub>in normal tissue and ipsilateral lung was significantly reduced by 3.5% and 10.4%, respectively, in non-UFD plans. The overall improvement is attributed to both the FLASH and fractionation effects.<i>Significance.</i>The fractionation dose optimization can address the limitation of multiple-beam FLASH-RT and utilize the relationship between fractional dose and FLASH effect. Consequently, the non-UFD scheme results in further improvements in normal tissue sparing compared to the UFD scheme, attributed to enhanced fractionation and FLASH effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad75e3
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Radiation Effects and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fractionation dose optimization facilities the implementation of transmission proton FLASH-RT

Y. Zeng, Zhiyong Yang, Muyu Liu, Qi Zhang et al.
4 citations
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Radiation Effects and Dosimetry
1.39
article

Fractionation dose optimization facilities the implementation of transmission proton FLASH-RT

Y. Zeng, Zhiyong Yang, Muyu Liu, Qi Zhang, Bo Pang, Hong Quan, Yu Hao Chang, Ye Wang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>The beam switching time and fractional dose influence the FLASH effect. A single-beam-per-fraction (SBPF) scheme using uniform fractional dose (UFD) has been proposed for FLASH- radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) to eliminate the beam switching time. Based on SBPF schemes, a fractionation dose optimization algorithm is proposed to optimize non-UFD plans to maximize the fractionation effect and dose-dependent FLASH effect.<i>Approach.</i>The UFD plan, containing five 236 MeV transmission proton beams, was optimized for 11 patients with peripheral lung cancer, with each beam delivering a uniform dose of 11 Gy to the target. Meanwhile, the non-UFD plan was optimized using fractionation dose optimization. To compare the two plans, the equivalent dose to 2 Gy (EQD2) for the target and normal tissues was calculated with an<i>α</i>/<i>β</i>ratio of 10 and 3, respectively. Both UFD and non-UFD plans ensured that the target received an EQD2 of 96.3 Gy. To investigate the overall improvement in normal tissue sparing with the non-UFD plan, the FLASH-enhanced EQD2 was calculated.<i>Main results.</i>The fractional doses in non-UFD plans ranged between 5.0 Gy and 24.2 Gy. No significant differences were found in EQD2<sub>2%</sub>and EQD2<sub>98%</sub>of targets between UFD and non-UFD plans. However, the<i>D</i><sub>95%</sub>of the target in non-UFD plans was significantly reduced by 15.1%. The sparing effect in non-UFD plans was significantly improved. The FLASH-enhanced EQD2<sub>mean</sub>in normal tissue and ipsilateral lung was significantly reduced by 3.5% and 10.4%, respectively, in non-UFD plans. The overall improvement is attributed to both the FLASH and fractionation effects.<i>Significance.</i>The fractionation dose optimization can address the limitation of multiple-beam FLASH-RT and utilize the relationship between fractional dose and FLASH effect. Consequently, the non-UFD scheme results in further improvements in normal tissue sparing compared to the UFD scheme, attributed to enhanced fractionation and FLASH effects.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 69(19)
Union Hospital (HK), Wuhan University of Technology (CN), Wuhan University (CN), Wuhan Union Hospital (CN), Union Hospital (CN), Wuhan University of Science and Technology (CN), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Radiation Effects and Dosimetry
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.