High rates of hydrogen sulfide emissions measured from marginal oil wells near Austin and San Antonio, Texas

Abstract Marginal oil and gas wells, or wells that produce less than 15 barrels of oil equivalent per day, represent 80% of actively producing wells in the United States, although they produce less than 10% of energy supply. Marginal wells are a disproportionate source of methane (CH 4 ) relative to their production, and they emit harmful air pollutants, such as benzene and other hydrocarbons found in oil and natural gas. We made direct measurements of CH 4 and hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) emissions from 46 wellheads in the Luling Field, Caldwell County, Texas, just east of the Austin/San Antonio Metroplex. We found that these wells are venting natural gas and are a large source of hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S), a poisonous air pollutant. Hydrogen sulfide emission rates ranged from 0 to 5 ± 0.5 g H 2 S hr −1 with an average emission rate of 1.6 ± 0.1 g H 2 S hr −1 . We also found ambient concentrations of H 2 S at dangerous levels (>100 ppm) near many of the wells. Methane emission rates were in line with previous studies of marginal wells, ranging from 0.0 to 2770 ± 390 g CH 4 hr −1 , with a skewed distribution and average emission rate of 710 ± 100 g CH 4 hr −1 . Oil production records from Texas were incomplete: some wells had oil production data from the year of sampling, but many had no production data for several years or decades, although they were actively pumping while we were on site. Interviews with local residents indicate that the closing of the county gas processing plant and subsequent loss of gathering lines may be the cause of gas venting and CH 4 and H 2 S emissions from production sites. This deserves further scrutiny, as marginal wells in this region are a major source of H 2 S, a health hazard to people living and working nearby.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Communications
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad75f0
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High rates of hydrogen sulfide emissions measured from marginal oil wells near Austin and San Antonio, Texas

Amy Jackson, Amy Townsend‐Small, Julianne M. Fernandez, Abigail Edgar et al.
6 citations
Environmental Research Communications
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
1.70
article

High rates of hydrogen sulfide emissions measured from marginal oil wells near Austin and San Antonio, Texas

Amy Jackson, Amy Townsend‐Small, Julianne M. Fernandez, Abigail Edgar, Nathan Currit
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Marginal oil and gas wells, or wells that produce less than 15 barrels of oil equivalent per day, represent 80% of actively producing wells in the United States, although they produce less than 10% of energy supply. Marginal wells are a disproportionate source of methane (CH 4 ) relative to their production, and they emit harmful air pollutants, such as benzene and other hydrocarbons found in oil and natural gas. We made direct measurements of CH 4 and hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) emissions from 46 wellheads in the Luling Field, Caldwell County, Texas, just east of the Austin/San Antonio Metroplex. We found that these wells are venting natural gas and are a large source of hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S), a poisonous air pollutant. Hydrogen sulfide emission rates ranged from 0 to 5 ± 0.5 g H 2 S hr −1 with an average emission rate of 1.6 ± 0.1 g H 2 S hr −1 . We also found ambient concentrations of H 2 S at dangerous levels (>100 ppm) near many of the wells. Methane emission rates were in line with previous studies of marginal wells, ranging from 0.0 to 2770 ± 390 g CH 4 hr −1 , with a skewed distribution and average emission rate of 710 ± 100 g CH 4 hr −1 . Oil production records from Texas were incomplete: some wells had oil production data from the year of sampling, but many had no production data for several years or decades, although they were actively pumping while we were on site. Interviews with local residents indicate that the closing of the county gas processing plant and subsequent loss of gathering lines may be the cause of gas venting and CH 4 and H 2 S emissions from production sites. This deserves further scrutiny, as marginal wells in this region are a major source of H 2 S, a health hazard to people living and working nearby.

Environmental Research CommunicationsVol. 6(9)
Texas State University (US), Sustainability Institute (ZA), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.