How pollinator dependence may mediate farmer adoption of pollinator supporting practices and perceptions: a case study from western France

Abstract There is limited knowledge on why farmers adopt pollinator-supporting practices, which is crucial to stimulate their adoption. The dependence of farmers on pollination may influence their perception of pollinators and their willingness to adopt these practices. We addressed why farmers adopt pollinator-supporting practices using a 2011 survey conducted within a cereal plain in western France, where farmers were moderately dependent on pollination for crops like oilseed rape and sunflower. We assessed the factors influencing the adoption of practices to promote pollination, including pollination dependence. We found no effect for pollination dependence. Conversely, we found that farm size, pesticide use, advisory services and the perception of costs decreased the willingness to adopt, while older farmers were more incline to adopt. We also evaluated perceptions related to pollinators: more than 85% of farmers considered bees important for crop production and recognized pesticides as a major cause of decline. We found no effect of pollination dependence on farmers’ perceptions. Compared to similar studies over the past decade, we found similarities, particularly regarding pollinator-related perceptions. Finally, we compared the willingness to adopt in 2011 with the actual adoption in 2024, showing that there has been little change. This raises questions on the pathways to promote the adoption of pollinator-supporting practices to ensure for the future of pollinator conservation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Communications
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad75ee
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How pollinator dependence may mediate farmer adoption of pollinator supporting practices and perceptions: a case study from western France

Fabrice Allier, Sabrina Gaba, Jérôme Faure, Lauriane Mouysset et al.
2 citations
Environmental Research Communications
Plant and animal studies
2.06
article

How pollinator dependence may mediate farmer adoption of pollinator supporting practices and perceptions: a case study from western France

Fabrice Allier, Sabrina Gaba, Jérôme Faure, Lauriane Mouysset, Axel Decourtye
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract There is limited knowledge on why farmers adopt pollinator-supporting practices, which is crucial to stimulate their adoption. The dependence of farmers on pollination may influence their perception of pollinators and their willingness to adopt these practices. We addressed why farmers adopt pollinator-supporting practices using a 2011 survey conducted within a cereal plain in western France, where farmers were moderately dependent on pollination for crops like oilseed rape and sunflower. We assessed the factors influencing the adoption of practices to promote pollination, including pollination dependence. We found no effect for pollination dependence. Conversely, we found that farm size, pesticide use, advisory services and the perception of costs decreased the willingness to adopt, while older farmers were more incline to adopt. We also evaluated perceptions related to pollinators: more than 85% of farmers considered bees important for crop production and recognized pesticides as a major cause of decline. We found no effect of pollination dependence on farmers’ perceptions. Compared to similar studies over the past decade, we found similarities, particularly regarding pollinator-related perceptions. Finally, we compared the willingness to adopt in 2011 with the actual adoption in 2024, showing that there has been little change. This raises questions on the pathways to promote the adoption of pollinator-supporting practices to ensure for the future of pollinator conservation.

Environmental Research CommunicationsVol. 6(9)
Université d'Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Groupe de Recherche en Économie Théorique et Appliquée (FR), Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (FR), Association pour l'Utilisation du Rein Artificiel dans la région Lyonnaise (FR), CIRED (FR), La Rochelle Université (FR)
European Commission, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Ministère de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Plant and animal studies
2.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.