Adaptive intensity modulated proton therapy using 4D robust planning: a proof-of-concept for the application of dose mimicking approach

<i>Objective.</i>A four-dimensional robust optimisation (4DRO) is usually employed when the tumour respiratory motion needs to be addressed. However, it is computationally demanding, and an automated method is preferable for adaptive planning to avoid manual trial-and-error. This study proposes a 4DRO technique based on dose mimicking for automated adaptive planning.<i>Approach.</i>Initial plans for 4DRO intensity modulated proton therapy were created on an average CT for four patients with clinical target volume (CTV) in the lung, oesophagus, or pancreas, respectively. These plans were robustly optimised using three phases of four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) and accounting for setup and density uncertainties. Weekly 4DCTs were used for adaptive replanning, using a constant relative biological effectiveness (cRBE) of 1.1. Two methods were used: (1) template-based adaptive (TA) planning and (2) dose-mimicking-based adaptive (MA) planning. The plans were evaluated using variable RBE (vRBE) weighted doses and biologically consistent dose accumulation (BCDA).<i>Main results.</i>MA and TA plans had comparable CTV coverage except for one patient where the MA plan had a higher D98 and lower D2 but with an increased D2 in few organs at risk (OARs). CTV D98 deviations in non-adaptive plans from the initial plans were up to -7.2 percentage points (p.p.) in individual cases and -1.8 p.p. when using BCDA. For the OARs, MA plans showed a reduced mean dose and D2 compared to the TA plans, with few exceptions. The vRBE-weighted accumulated doses had a mean dose and D2 difference of up to 0.3 Gy and 0.5 Gy, respectively, in the OARs with respect to cRBE-weighted doses.<i>Significance.</i>MA plans indicate better performance in target coverage and OAR dose sparing compared to the TA plans in 4DRO adaptive planning. Moreover, MA method is capable of handling both forms of anatomical variation, namely, changes in density and relative shifts in the position of OARs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad75e0
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adaptive intensity modulated proton therapy using 4D robust planning: a proof-of-concept for the application of dose mimicking approach

Kristin Stützer, Suryakant Kaushik, Jakob Ödén, Albin Fredriksson et al.
4 citations
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
1.68
article

Adaptive intensity modulated proton therapy using 4D robust planning: a proof-of-concept for the application of dose mimicking approach

Kristin Stützer, Suryakant Kaushik, Jakob Ödén, Albin Fredriksson, Iuliana Toma-Daşu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>A four-dimensional robust optimisation (4DRO) is usually employed when the tumour respiratory motion needs to be addressed. However, it is computationally demanding, and an automated method is preferable for adaptive planning to avoid manual trial-and-error. This study proposes a 4DRO technique based on dose mimicking for automated adaptive planning.<i>Approach.</i>Initial plans for 4DRO intensity modulated proton therapy were created on an average CT for four patients with clinical target volume (CTV) in the lung, oesophagus, or pancreas, respectively. These plans were robustly optimised using three phases of four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) and accounting for setup and density uncertainties. Weekly 4DCTs were used for adaptive replanning, using a constant relative biological effectiveness (cRBE) of 1.1. Two methods were used: (1) template-based adaptive (TA) planning and (2) dose-mimicking-based adaptive (MA) planning. The plans were evaluated using variable RBE (vRBE) weighted doses and biologically consistent dose accumulation (BCDA).<i>Main results.</i>MA and TA plans had comparable CTV coverage except for one patient where the MA plan had a higher D98 and lower D2 but with an increased D2 in few organs at risk (OARs). CTV D98 deviations in non-adaptive plans from the initial plans were up to -7.2 percentage points (p.p.) in individual cases and -1.8 p.p. when using BCDA. For the OARs, MA plans showed a reduced mean dose and D2 compared to the TA plans, with few exceptions. The vRBE-weighted accumulated doses had a mean dose and D2 difference of up to 0.3 Gy and 0.5 Gy, respectively, in the OARs with respect to cRBE-weighted doses.<i>Significance.</i>MA plans indicate better performance in target coverage and OAR dose sparing compared to the TA plans in 4DRO adaptive planning. Moreover, MA method is capable of handling both forms of anatomical variation, namely, changes in density and relative shifts in the position of OARs.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 69(18)
Stockholm University (SE), Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (DE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), OncoRay (DE), RaySearch Laboratories (Sweden) (SE), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
1.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.