Investigation of pedestal parameters and divertor heat fluxes in small ELM regimes in DIII-D

Abstract Divertor heat flux and its correlation with pedestal parameters within various small edge localized mode (ELM) regimes, including high beta poloidal, type-II and ELMs with negative triangularity H-modes were investigated in DIII-D. The parallel energy fluences of type-II and high beta poloidal small ELM regimes fall below the linear scaling with pedestal electron pressure for type-I ELMs put forward in Eich et al 2017 ( Nucl. Mater. Energy 12 84–90). The negative triangularity of H-mode ELMs follow the Eich scaling for type-I ELMs. The parallel heat flux and total heat loads to the divertor were determined using high-time resolution infrared thermography, while pedestal parameters were obtained through self-consistent kinetic equilibrium reconstructions. Linear regressions for the type-II and high beta poloidal regimes demonstrate that an equivalent 7.5 MA small ELM scenario in ITER would fall below the ~5 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>MJ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> <mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0"/> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> leading edge melting limit for tungsten (Gunn et al 2017 Nucl. Fusion 57 046025). Utilizing fast thermography, the scrape-off layer power fall-off length for both inter-ELM and intra-ELM was determined and compared to the Eich scaling with poloidal magnetic field in Eich et al (ASDEX Upgrade Team and JET EFDA Contributors 2013 Nucl. Fusion 53 093031). Except for the high beta poloidal scenario, all the small ELM regimes during both inter- and intra-ELM periods had power fall-off lengths <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> larger then would be expected from the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>pol</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>MP</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> scaling associated with type-I ELMs, signifying their potential in managing heat loads and offering a solution for core–edge integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Fusion
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ad75a4
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation of pedestal parameters and divertor heat fluxes in small ELM regimes in DIII-D

T.H. Osborne, P. Traverso, C.J. Lasnier, A.W. Leonard et al.
3 citations
Nuclear Fusion
Magnetic confinement fusion research
1.98
article

Investigation of pedestal parameters and divertor heat fluxes in small ELM regimes in DIII-D

T.H. Osborne, P. Traverso, C.J. Lasnier, A.W. Leonard, Huiqian Wang, M. Knölker, Mariah J. Austin
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Divertor heat flux and its correlation with pedestal parameters within various small edge localized mode (ELM) regimes, including high beta poloidal, type-II and ELMs with negative triangularity H-modes were investigated in DIII-D. The parallel energy fluences of type-II and high beta poloidal small ELM regimes fall below the linear scaling with pedestal electron pressure for type-I ELMs put forward in Eich et al 2017 ( Nucl. Mater. Energy 12 84–90). The negative triangularity of H-mode ELMs follow the Eich scaling for type-I ELMs. The parallel heat flux and total heat loads to the divertor were determined using high-time resolution infrared thermography, while pedestal parameters were obtained through self-consistent kinetic equilibrium reconstructions. Linear regressions for the type-II and high beta poloidal regimes demonstrate that an equivalent 7.5 MA small ELM scenario in ITER would fall below the ~5 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>MJ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> <mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0"/> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> leading edge melting limit for tungsten (Gunn et al 2017 Nucl. Fusion 57 046025). Utilizing fast thermography, the scrape-off layer power fall-off length for both inter-ELM and intra-ELM was determined and compared to the Eich scaling with poloidal magnetic field in Eich et al (ASDEX Upgrade Team and JET EFDA Contributors 2013 Nucl. Fusion 53 093031). Except for the high beta poloidal scenario, all the small ELM regimes during both inter- and intra-ELM periods had power fall-off lengths <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>(</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> larger then would be expected from the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mi>B</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>pol</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>MP</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> scaling associated with type-I ELMs, signifying their potential in managing heat loads and offering a solution for core–edge integration.

Nuclear FusionVol. 64(10)
Oak Ridge Associated Universities (US), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US), General Atomics (United States) (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Fusion Energy Sciences
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
1.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.