Subsidizing Inclusive Insurance to Reduce Poverty

In this article, we assess the benefits of coordination and partnerships between governments and private insurers and provide further evidence for microinsurance products as powerful and cost-effective tools for achieving poverty reduction. To explore these ideas, we model the capital of a household from a ruin-theoretic perspective to measure the impact of microinsurance on poverty dynamics and the governmental cost of social protection. We analyze the model under four frameworks: uninsured, insured (without subsidies), insured with subsidized constant premiums, and insured with subsidized flexible premiums. Although insurance alone (without subsidies) may not be sufficient to reduce the likelihood of falling into the area of poverty for specific groups of households, because premium payments constrain their capital growth, our analysis suggests that subsidized schemes can provide maximum social benefits while reducing governmental costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
North American Actuarial Journal
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2024.2311673
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global Health Care Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subsidizing Inclusive Insurance to Reduce Poverty

Corina Constantinescu, José Miguel Flores-Contró, Séverine Arnold, Sooie-Hoe Loke et al.
2 citations
North American Actuarial Journal
Global Health Care Issues
1.70
article

Subsidizing Inclusive Insurance to Reduce Poverty

Corina Constantinescu, José Miguel Flores-Contró, Séverine Arnold, Sooie-Hoe Loke, Kira Henshaw
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this article, we assess the benefits of coordination and partnerships between governments and private insurers and provide further evidence for microinsurance products as powerful and cost-effective tools for achieving poverty reduction. To explore these ideas, we model the capital of a household from a ruin-theoretic perspective to measure the impact of microinsurance on poverty dynamics and the governmental cost of social protection. We analyze the model under four frameworks: uninsured, insured (without subsidies), insured with subsidized constant premiums, and insured with subsidized flexible premiums. Although insurance alone (without subsidies) may not be sufficient to reduce the likelihood of falling into the area of poverty for specific groups of households, because premium payments constrain their capital growth, our analysis suggests that subsidized schemes can provide maximum social benefits while reducing governmental costs.

North American Actuarial JournalVol. 29(1)
University of Liverpool (GB), Central Washington University (US), Mathematical Sciences Research Institute (US), University of Lausanne (CH)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Global Health Care Issues
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.