An efficient decision-making model for evaluating irrigation systems under uncertainty: Toward integrated approaches to sustainability

Agriculture is essential for many countries that depend on crops for food production and security. So, evaluating irrigation systems and selecting the best one is critical and gives various benefits such as water use efficiency, productivity, and agricultural development. This paper proposed a framework for conserving water and increasing effectiveness by using a suitable irrigation system. We used the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology to deal with conflict criteria in the evaluation process. We used two MCDM methods such as Criteria Importance Through Inter-Criteria Correlation (CRITIC) method to compute the weights of the irrigation system criteria, and the spherical fuzzy double normalization-based multiple aggregations (DNMA) method to rank the irrigation systems (alternatives). The main advantage of CRITIC method computes the conflict and variability of the criteria by calculate weights of them. The main advantage of DNMA is used the two normalization method to rank the alternatives. These methods are integrated with spherical fuzzy set (SFS) fuzzy information in the assessment process. It has three values: membership, non-membership, and hesitant degrees to overcome uncertainty in the assessment steps. The proposed methodology is applied to a case study to show its performance. This study used 20 criteria of irrigation systems and 10 irrigation systems (alternatives) to select the best alternative. The results are discussed from the perspective of five experts. The sensitivity analysis is conducted to show the stability of the results. The comparative analysis is performed to show the validity and effectiveness of the proposed methodology. The results show the proposed methodology is more robust compared to other methods. • Irrigation systems are evaluated under uncertainty model. • CRITIC and DNMA methods are used to evaluate the irrigation systems. • The spherical fuzzy set used to deal with uncertainty information in the evaluation process. • Intensive verifications with other challenging approaches are discussed. • A case study is proposed to illustrate the rationality of the proposed model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109034
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Water resources management and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An efficient decision-making model for evaluating irrigation systems under uncertainty: Toward integrated approaches to sustainability

Karam M. Sallam, Ibrahim A. Hameed, Ibrahim M. Hezam, Mohamed Abdel‐Basset et al.
7 citations
Agricultural Water Management
Water resources management and optimization
2.35
article

An efficient decision-making model for evaluating irrigation systems under uncertainty: Toward integrated approaches to sustainability

Karam M. Sallam, Ibrahim A. Hameed, Ibrahim M. Hezam, Mohamed Abdel‐Basset, Ahmed M. Ali
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Agriculture is essential for many countries that depend on crops for food production and security. So, evaluating irrigation systems and selecting the best one is critical and gives various benefits such as water use efficiency, productivity, and agricultural development. This paper proposed a framework for conserving water and increasing effectiveness by using a suitable irrigation system. We used the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology to deal with conflict criteria in the evaluation process. We used two MCDM methods such as Criteria Importance Through Inter-Criteria Correlation (CRITIC) method to compute the weights of the irrigation system criteria, and the spherical fuzzy double normalization-based multiple aggregations (DNMA) method to rank the irrigation systems (alternatives). The main advantage of CRITIC method computes the conflict and variability of the criteria by calculate weights of them. The main advantage of DNMA is used the two normalization method to rank the alternatives. These methods are integrated with spherical fuzzy set (SFS) fuzzy information in the assessment process. It has three values: membership, non-membership, and hesitant degrees to overcome uncertainty in the assessment steps. The proposed methodology is applied to a case study to show its performance. This study used 20 criteria of irrigation systems and 10 irrigation systems (alternatives) to select the best alternative. The results are discussed from the perspective of five experts. The sensitivity analysis is conducted to show the stability of the results. The comparative analysis is performed to show the validity and effectiveness of the proposed methodology. The results show the proposed methodology is more robust compared to other methods. • Irrigation systems are evaluated under uncertainty model. • CRITIC and DNMA methods are used to evaluate the irrigation systems. • The spherical fuzzy set used to deal with uncertainty information in the evaluation process. • Intensive verifications with other challenging approaches are discussed. • A case study is proposed to illustrate the rationality of the proposed model.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 303
Zagazig University (EG), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), King Saud University (SA), University of Sharjah (AE)
Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet, King Saud University
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Water resources management and optimization
2.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.