Multiprofessional perceptions and barriers to early mobilization in intensive care: a study at a university hospital

INTRODUCTION: Hospitalization often causes mobility difficulties and hinders daily activities. Progressive mobilization of patients in intensive care units (ICUs) is safe and linked to better clinical and functional outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To assess the perception of a multidisciplinary team in the ICUs of a university hospital regarding early mobilization (EM). METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted using data collected from professionals and students in the ICU of Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro between June and December 2019. Data on EM perception were collected using a questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests were used to analyze the differences between the professional categories. RESULTS: In comparison to physiotherapists (88%), a smaller percentage of physicians (37.5%) and nurses (50%) reported that patients on mechanical ventilation (MV) are mobilized within 48 hours (P<0.05). Additionally, a smaller percentage of physicians and nurses reported that their workload was sufficient to mobilize patients at least once a day (62.5% vs. 62.5% vs. 96%; P<0.05). Physiotherapists reported more frequently than physicians that “patients undergoing procedures” were a barrier (57.7% vs. 18.7%; P<0.05). Conversely, regarding mechanical ventilation (MV), physicians identified this barrier more frequently (43.7% vs. 7.7%; P<0.05). There was overall agreement on the benefits of EM (>80%), with the main perceived barriers being the availability of professionals (58%), the clinical condition of patients (55%) and patients undergoing procedures (45%). CONCLUSION: In a university hospital without an established EM protocol, the multidisciplinary team showed satisfactory knowledge and perceptions of EM. However, creating institutional protocols and guidelines is essential to engage multidisciplinary teams in implementing EM and overcoming barriers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17267/2238-2704rpf.2024.e5448
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiprofessional perceptions and barriers to early mobilization in intensive care: a study at a university hospital

Sara Lúcia Silveira de Menezes, Marco Orsini, Fernanda Soares Mendes, Fernando Silva Guimarães
1 citations
Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
0.42
article

Multiprofessional perceptions and barriers to early mobilization in intensive care: a study at a university hospital

Sara Lúcia Silveira de Menezes, Marco Orsini, Fernanda Soares Mendes, Fernando Silva Guimarães
article en
1 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hospitalization often causes mobility difficulties and hinders daily activities. Progressive mobilization of patients in intensive care units (ICUs) is safe and linked to better clinical and functional outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To assess the perception of a multidisciplinary team in the ICUs of a university hospital regarding early mobilization (EM). METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted using data collected from professionals and students in the ICU of Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro between June and December 2019. Data on EM perception were collected using a questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests were used to analyze the differences between the professional categories. RESULTS: In comparison to physiotherapists (88%), a smaller percentage of physicians (37.5%) and nurses (50%) reported that patients on mechanical ventilation (MV) are mobilized within 48 hours (P<0.05). Additionally, a smaller percentage of physicians and nurses reported that their workload was sufficient to mobilize patients at least once a day (62.5% vs. 62.5% vs. 96%; P<0.05). Physiotherapists reported more frequently than physicians that “patients undergoing procedures” were a barrier (57.7% vs. 18.7%; P<0.05). Conversely, regarding mechanical ventilation (MV), physicians identified this barrier more frequently (43.7% vs. 7.7%; P<0.05). There was overall agreement on the benefits of EM (>80%), with the main perceived barriers being the availability of professionals (58%), the clinical condition of patients (55%) and patients undergoing procedures (45%). CONCLUSION: In a university hospital without an established EM protocol, the multidisciplinary team showed satisfactory knowledge and perceptions of EM. However, creating institutional protocols and guidelines is essential to engage multidisciplinary teams in implementing EM and overcoming barriers.

Revista Pesquisa em FisioterapiaVol. 14
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Universidade Iguaçu (BR), Universidade Salgado de Oliveira (BR), Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.