Low-emission hydrogen production from gasification of Australian coals – Process simulation and technoeconomic assessment

Although renewable energy-based technologies such as water electrolysis and biomass gasification for hydrogen production are cleaner than fossil energy-based routes, there are still prevailing challenges associated with the high cost and operational challenges in the scale-up of those technologies in the short term. Considering the abundance of coal as a current primary source of energy in Australia, the use of coal to produce hydrogen is not only in line with Australia's resource endowment but is also expected to become a supplement to the other hydrogen production pathways during the global energy transition period. This paper presents a comprehensive techno-economic assessment of low-emission hydrogen production from Australian coal gasification integrated with carbon capture and storage (CCS). The study explores four cases of hydrogen production, comparing Australian brown coal (Victorian brown coal) and black coal (Queensland black coal) gasification. Variations in gasifiers, gasification agents, and associated operating conditions contribute to differences in energy efficiency, costs, and CO 2 emissions among the cases. The findings reveal a levelized cost of hydrogen from coal gasification ranging between A$4.12–4.90 per kg of hydrogen. Notably, entrained flow gasification of Victorian brown coal in a mixture of oxygen and steam environment demonstrates advantages under the current market conditions. However, less mature technologies like dual fluidized bed gasifiers could emerge as viable alternatives if deployed on a commercial scale. The study also addresses direct carbon emissions from the process, indicating a CO 2 emission intensity range of 16.3–20.9 kg CO 2 /kg H 2 without CCS and 0.1–1.1 kg CO 2 /kg H 2 with CCS for the four cases. These insights contribute valuable information for decision-making in the pursuit of sustainable and economically feasible hydrogen production methods during the ongoing energy transition. • Coal is the primary source of energy in Australia and could still play a role in the transition to a low-carbon future. • Coal gasification integrated with CCS is a viable option for low-emission hydrogen production. • The Levelized cost of Hydrogen from Australian coal gasification is A$4.12–4.90/kg H 2 . • EFR gasification of VBC in an O 2 /steam environment is the most economically viable option for hydrogen production. • The Direct CO 2 emission from coal-to-H 2 with CCS is 0.1–1.1 kgCO 2 /kgH 2 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.08.256
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low-emission hydrogen production from gasification of Australian coals – Process simulation and technoeconomic assessment

Tahereh Hosseini, Simon Smart, Peter J. Ashman, Mojgan Tabatabaei-Zavareh
11 citations
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
2.34
article

Low-emission hydrogen production from gasification of Australian coals – Process simulation and technoeconomic assessment

Tahereh Hosseini, Simon Smart, Peter J. Ashman, Mojgan Tabatabaei-Zavareh
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Although renewable energy-based technologies such as water electrolysis and biomass gasification for hydrogen production are cleaner than fossil energy-based routes, there are still prevailing challenges associated with the high cost and operational challenges in the scale-up of those technologies in the short term. Considering the abundance of coal as a current primary source of energy in Australia, the use of coal to produce hydrogen is not only in line with Australia's resource endowment but is also expected to become a supplement to the other hydrogen production pathways during the global energy transition period. This paper presents a comprehensive techno-economic assessment of low-emission hydrogen production from Australian coal gasification integrated with carbon capture and storage (CCS). The study explores four cases of hydrogen production, comparing Australian brown coal (Victorian brown coal) and black coal (Queensland black coal) gasification. Variations in gasifiers, gasification agents, and associated operating conditions contribute to differences in energy efficiency, costs, and CO 2 emissions among the cases. The findings reveal a levelized cost of hydrogen from coal gasification ranging between A$4.12–4.90 per kg of hydrogen. Notably, entrained flow gasification of Victorian brown coal in a mixture of oxygen and steam environment demonstrates advantages under the current market conditions. However, less mature technologies like dual fluidized bed gasifiers could emerge as viable alternatives if deployed on a commercial scale. The study also addresses direct carbon emissions from the process, indicating a CO 2 emission intensity range of 16.3–20.9 kg CO 2 /kg H 2 without CCS and 0.1–1.1 kg CO 2 /kg H 2 with CCS for the four cases. These insights contribute valuable information for decision-making in the pursuit of sustainable and economically feasible hydrogen production methods during the ongoing energy transition. • Coal is the primary source of energy in Australia and could still play a role in the transition to a low-carbon future. • Coal gasification integrated with CCS is a viable option for low-emission hydrogen production. • The Levelized cost of Hydrogen from Australian coal gasification is A$4.12–4.90/kg H 2 . • EFR gasification of VBC in an O 2 /steam environment is the most economically viable option for hydrogen production. • The Direct CO 2 emission from coal-to-H 2 with CCS is 0.1–1.1 kgCO 2 /kgH 2 .

International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyVol. 86
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Cooperative Research Centres, Australian Government Department of Industry
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
2.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.