Restrictions on use of common areas of Apartments: Focusing on banning electric vehicles from using parking lots

This study reviewed the case of a resolution made by the residents' representative meeting that decided to ban electric vehicles from entering the underground parking lot of an apartment building. We reviewed what the case means in two Acts, and looked into what was necessary for the decision to be properly effective. The contents of this study are summarized as follows. First of all, establishing the relationship between two Acts is an important issue for application and interpretation of the target case. Since the Multi-Family Housing Management Act and Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings have different objectives and different targets of application, they should be viewed as different laws. Considering this relationship, Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings should be applied first when it comes to ownership right. However, in terms of management, Multi-Family Housing Management Act, which stipulates mandatory management targets, must be applied, and Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings must be applied to other apartment complexes. Looking at the decision of the residents' representative meeting that electric vehicles cannot enter the underground parking lot, the residents' representative meeting only has the management authority to decide and implement matters related to the management of the apartment complex, and cannot exercise the rights of owners. Therefore, in order to make the decision covered in the target case, a resolution or participation in a management meeting will be required by Sectional Owner to respect the Sectional Owner's right to use the common areas. Management Rule prohibiting electric vehicle owners from using underground parking lots may limit or exclude the right to use section for common use. Therefore, it is difficult to justify the restriction through a resolution under Multi-Family Housing Management Act, and revision must be made according to a resolution under Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings.

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Institute for Aggregate Buildings Law
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55029/kabl.2024.51.163
Primary Topic
Smart Parking Systems Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Restrictions on use of common areas of Apartments: Focusing on banning electric vehicles from using parking lots

Korean Institute for Aggregate Buildings Law
Smart Parking Systems Research
article

Restrictions on use of common areas of Apartments: Focusing on banning electric vehicles from using parking lots

article en

Abstract

This study reviewed the case of a resolution made by the residents' representative meeting that decided to ban electric vehicles from entering the underground parking lot of an apartment building. We reviewed what the case means in two Acts, and looked into what was necessary for the decision to be properly effective. The contents of this study are summarized as follows. First of all, establishing the relationship between two Acts is an important issue for application and interpretation of the target case. Since the Multi-Family Housing Management Act and Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings have different objectives and different targets of application, they should be viewed as different laws. Considering this relationship, Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings should be applied first when it comes to ownership right. However, in terms of management, Multi-Family Housing Management Act, which stipulates mandatory management targets, must be applied, and Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings must be applied to other apartment complexes. Looking at the decision of the residents' representative meeting that electric vehicles cannot enter the underground parking lot, the residents' representative meeting only has the management authority to decide and implement matters related to the management of the apartment complex, and cannot exercise the rights of owners. Therefore, in order to make the decision covered in the target case, a resolution or participation in a management meeting will be required by Sectional Owner to respect the Sectional Owner's right to use the common areas. Management Rule prohibiting electric vehicle owners from using underground parking lots may limit or exclude the right to use section for common use. Therefore, it is difficult to justify the restriction through a resolution under Multi-Family Housing Management Act, and revision must be made according to a resolution under Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings.

Korean Institute for Aggregate Buildings LawVol. 51
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Smart Parking Systems Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Restrictions on use of common areas of Apartments: Focusing on banning electric vehicles from using parking lots · Korean Institute for Aggregate Buildings Law (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS