ACCURACY OF FOUR INTRAORAL SCANNERS IN FULL-ARCH SCANS

This research aims to evaluate the accuracy of four intraoral scanner models in full-arch scans. A master model was scanned using a high-precision desktop scanner, and a digital reference model was created. The master model was then scanned ten times by each of the intraoral scanners studied (TRIOS® 3, CEREC OmniCam, iTero™, and Medit i500). The digital models were compared to the master model using 3D measurement software. The analysis revealed significant differences in accuracy among the studied scanners, with the iTero™ scanner showing the best performance (p=0.0003). All scanners exhibited an average discrepancy of less than seventy micrometers in full-arch scans. These findings suggest that while all tested scanners are within clinically acceptable accuracy limits, the iTero™ may offer superior performance for full-arch digital impressions, potentially leading to improved outcomes in extensive dental rehabilitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista CPAQV - Centro de Pesquisas Avançadas em Qualidade de Vida
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36692/v16n2-77
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ACCURACY OF FOUR INTRAORAL SCANNERS IN FULL-ARCH SCANS

Fabiano Perez, Sérgio Cândido Dias, Geraldo Alberto Pinheiro de Carvalho, Matheus Franco Lourenço et al.
Revista CPAQV - Centro de Pesquisas Avançadas em Qualidade de Vida
Dental materials and restorations
article

ACCURACY OF FOUR INTRAORAL SCANNERS IN FULL-ARCH SCANS

Fabiano Perez, Sérgio Cândido Dias, Geraldo Alberto Pinheiro de Carvalho, Matheus Franco Lourenço, Sílvio Mecca Júnior
article en

Abstract

This research aims to evaluate the accuracy of four intraoral scanner models in full-arch scans. A master model was scanned using a high-precision desktop scanner, and a digital reference model was created. The master model was then scanned ten times by each of the intraoral scanners studied (TRIOS® 3, CEREC OmniCam, iTero™, and Medit i500). The digital models were compared to the master model using 3D measurement software. The analysis revealed significant differences in accuracy among the studied scanners, with the iTero™ scanner showing the best performance (p=0.0003). All scanners exhibited an average discrepancy of less than seventy micrometers in full-arch scans. These findings suggest that while all tested scanners are within clinically acceptable accuracy limits, the iTero™ may offer superior performance for full-arch digital impressions, potentially leading to improved outcomes in extensive dental rehabilitations.

Revista CPAQV - Centro de Pesquisas Avançadas em Qualidade de VidaVol. 16(2)
Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.