Evaluation of environmental emissions from glo heated tobacco products and combustible Cigarettes

• glo HTPs produce lower secondhand constituents than cigarettes in indoor air. • glo HTPs reduce indoor air quality contamination more than cigarettes. • glo HTPs reduce non-user exposure to harmful constituents more than cigarettes. • glo HTPs may potentially contribute positively to tobacco harm reduction efforts. Compared to cigarette smoke, heated tobacco product (HTP) aerosol contains significantly fewer and lower levels of harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs). However, the impact on environmental air is relatively unexplored. Therefore, this study compared levels of secondhand aerosol (SHA) constituents in air following glo HTP use with secondhand smoke (SHS) constituents following cigarette smoking in an environmental test chamber (ETC). Extracted ETC air samples following product use sessions were analyzed for 27 SHS/SHA constituents, including HPHCs. The use of glo HTPs resulted in significantly lower SHA HPHC levels in the ETC air relative to SHS HPHC levels from cigarette smoking. Some aerosol constituents (benzene, CO, formaldehyde, nicotine, respirable suspended particles, toluene, ethylbenzene, fine particulate matter, m- and p-cresol, o-cresol, pyridine, styrene, and ultraviolet particulate matter) were either below the limit of detection in ETC air or at significantly low levels following glo HTP use relative to cigarette smoking. Mean concentrations of the assessed constituents were at least 90 % lower following use of glo HTPs compared to smoking combustible cigarettes. These results suggest that glo HTP use would not contribute significantly to indoor air contamination and would reduce non-user exposure to HPHCs and other harmful constituents relative to combustible cigarettes. Such reductions in non-user exposure should be considered when assessing the tobacco harm reduction potential of glo HTPs.