A Rank Graduation Box for SAFE AI

The growth of Artificial Intelligence applications requires to develop risk management models that can balance opportunities with risks. We contribute to the development of Artificial Intelligence risk models proposing a Rank Graduation Box (RGB), a set of integrated statistical metrics that can measure the “Sustainability”, “Accuracy”, “Fairness” and “Explainability” of any Artificial Intelligence application. Our metrics are consistent with each other, as they are all derived from a common underlying statistical methodology: the Lorenz curve. The validity of the metrics is assessed by means of their practical application to both simulated and real data. The results from the comparison of alternative machine learning models to simulated data are aligned with the generating models, in general indicating linear regression models as the most accurate, regression tree models as the most fair, Random Forest models as the most robust; and leading to model explanations similar to the true ones from the generating model. The outcomes from the application of Random Forest models to real data show that the proposed RGB metrics are more interpretable and more consistent with the expectations, with respect to standard metrics such as AUC, RMSE and Shapley values. The evidence also shows that the RGB metrics are very general and can be applied to any machine learning method, regardless of the underlying data and model. • A new toolkit for evaluating the trustworthiness condition of AI systems. • Our method is based on the use of the Lorenz and concordance curves. • The metrics provide a measure of the compliance AI applications as a percentage. • The application shows the suitability of the approach for assessing AI methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Systems with Applications
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125239
Citations
82
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
28.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Rank Graduation Box for SAFE AI

Emanuela Raffinetti, Golnoosh Babaei, Paolo Giudici
82 citations
Expert Systems with Applications
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
28.49
article

A Rank Graduation Box for SAFE AI

Emanuela Raffinetti, Golnoosh Babaei, Paolo Giudici
article en
82 citations

Abstract

The growth of Artificial Intelligence applications requires to develop risk management models that can balance opportunities with risks. We contribute to the development of Artificial Intelligence risk models proposing a Rank Graduation Box (RGB), a set of integrated statistical metrics that can measure the “Sustainability”, “Accuracy”, “Fairness” and “Explainability” of any Artificial Intelligence application. Our metrics are consistent with each other, as they are all derived from a common underlying statistical methodology: the Lorenz curve. The validity of the metrics is assessed by means of their practical application to both simulated and real data. The results from the comparison of alternative machine learning models to simulated data are aligned with the generating models, in general indicating linear regression models as the most accurate, regression tree models as the most fair, Random Forest models as the most robust; and leading to model explanations similar to the true ones from the generating model. The outcomes from the application of Random Forest models to real data show that the proposed RGB metrics are more interpretable and more consistent with the expectations, with respect to standard metrics such as AUC, RMSE and Shapley values. The evidence also shows that the RGB metrics are very general and can be applied to any machine learning method, regardless of the underlying data and model. • A new toolkit for evaluating the trustworthiness condition of AI systems. • Our method is based on the use of the Lorenz and concordance curves. • The metrics provide a measure of the compliance AI applications as a percentage. • The application shows the suitability of the approach for assessing AI methods.

Expert Systems with ApplicationsVol. 259
University of Pavia (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
28.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.