Extraction of pesticides from soil using direct-immersion SPME LC-Tips followed by GC–MS/MS: Evaluation and proof-of-concept

A new method was evaluated and developed for the analysis of pesticides in sandy-loam soil by direct-immersion solid phase microextraction (DI-SPME) followed by gas chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) determination. Ten pesticides were selected based on a literature survey of the compounds reported to be present in EU soils. The extraction was performed using SPME LC-Tips, a new SPME configuration with the coated fibers attached to a disposable and easy-to-handle micropipette tip, which was immersed into a soil slurry made by the addition of an aqueous solution to the soil sample. Ten experimental parameters were evaluated with a Plackett-Burman design, after which the extraction time and percentage of organic solvent in the aqueous extraction were optimized separately. The two fiber chemistries available (PDMS/DVB and C<sub>18</sub>) were evaluated in parallel for the entire work. In the final method, slurry samples were made by adding an aqueous solution (6 % methanol v/v) to 2 g of soil. The fiber was conditioned and then inserted, for extraction, into the samples, stirred by a magnetic bar. Afterwards, the analytes were desorbed onto 100 µL of methanol. After the addition of analyte protectants (ethylglycerol, gulonolactone, and sorbitol) the extract was injected into the GC-MS/MS system. Isotopically labelled penconazole was used as internal standard. A calibration was performed by extracting spiked soil with analyte concentrations of 0.1-50 µg/kg. Coefficients of determination of the linear calibration were between 0.94-0.98 for the PDMS/DVB and 0.92-0.99 for the C<sub>18</sub>. Limits of detection range between 0.01-10 µg/kg for the PDMS/DVB and 0.1-10 µg/kg for the C<sub>18</sub>. Overall, the C<sub>18</sub> analytically outperformed the PDMS/DVB but required a longer extraction time (120 min vs 75 min for the PDMS/DVB). This method allows automation and generates low residual toxic waste, having the potential to be introduced as a greener and simpler alternative to currently used sample preparation methodologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chromatography A
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465295
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Analytical chemistry methods development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extraction of pesticides from soil using direct-immersion SPME LC-Tips followed by GC–MS/MS: Evaluation and proof-of-concept

João Brinco, Paula Guedes, Marco Gomes da Silva, Alexandra B. Ribeiro et al.
9 citations
Journal of Chromatography A
Analytical chemistry methods development
2.12
article

Extraction of pesticides from soil using direct-immersion SPME LC-Tips followed by GC–MS/MS: Evaluation and proof-of-concept

João Brinco, Paula Guedes, Marco Gomes da Silva, Alexandra B. Ribeiro, Raquel Carvalho, Eduardo P. Mateus
article en
9 citations

Abstract

A new method was evaluated and developed for the analysis of pesticides in sandy-loam soil by direct-immersion solid phase microextraction (DI-SPME) followed by gas chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) determination. Ten pesticides were selected based on a literature survey of the compounds reported to be present in EU soils. The extraction was performed using SPME LC-Tips, a new SPME configuration with the coated fibers attached to a disposable and easy-to-handle micropipette tip, which was immersed into a soil slurry made by the addition of an aqueous solution to the soil sample. Ten experimental parameters were evaluated with a Plackett-Burman design, after which the extraction time and percentage of organic solvent in the aqueous extraction were optimized separately. The two fiber chemistries available (PDMS/DVB and C<sub>18</sub>) were evaluated in parallel for the entire work. In the final method, slurry samples were made by adding an aqueous solution (6 % methanol v/v) to 2 g of soil. The fiber was conditioned and then inserted, for extraction, into the samples, stirred by a magnetic bar. Afterwards, the analytes were desorbed onto 100 µL of methanol. After the addition of analyte protectants (ethylglycerol, gulonolactone, and sorbitol) the extract was injected into the GC-MS/MS system. Isotopically labelled penconazole was used as internal standard. A calibration was performed by extracting spiked soil with analyte concentrations of 0.1-50 µg/kg. Coefficients of determination of the linear calibration were between 0.94-0.98 for the PDMS/DVB and 0.92-0.99 for the C<sub>18</sub>. Limits of detection range between 0.01-10 µg/kg for the PDMS/DVB and 0.1-10 µg/kg for the C<sub>18</sub>. Overall, the C<sub>18</sub> analytically outperformed the PDMS/DVB but required a longer extraction time (120 min vs 75 min for the PDMS/DVB). This method allows automation and generates low residual toxic waste, having the potential to be introduced as a greener and simpler alternative to currently used sample preparation methodologies.

Journal of Chromatography AVol. 1735
Sustainability Institute (ZA), Rede de Química e Tecnologia (PT), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Analytical chemistry methods development
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.