Extraction of pesticides from soil using direct-immersion SPME LC-Tips followed by GC–MS/MS: Evaluation and proof-of-concept
A new method was evaluated and developed for the analysis of pesticides in sandy-loam soil by direct-immersion solid phase microextraction (DI-SPME) followed by gas chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) determination. Ten pesticides were selected based on a literature survey of the compounds reported to be present in EU soils. The extraction was performed using SPME LC-Tips, a new SPME configuration with the coated fibers attached to a disposable and easy-to-handle micropipette tip, which was immersed into a soil slurry made by the addition of an aqueous solution to the soil sample. Ten experimental parameters were evaluated with a Plackett-Burman design, after which the extraction time and percentage of organic solvent in the aqueous extraction were optimized separately. The two fiber chemistries available (PDMS/DVB and C<sub>18</sub>) were evaluated in parallel for the entire work. In the final method, slurry samples were made by adding an aqueous solution (6 % methanol v/v) to 2 g of soil. The fiber was conditioned and then inserted, for extraction, into the samples, stirred by a magnetic bar. Afterwards, the analytes were desorbed onto 100 µL of methanol. After the addition of analyte protectants (ethylglycerol, gulonolactone, and sorbitol) the extract was injected into the GC-MS/MS system. Isotopically labelled penconazole was used as internal standard. A calibration was performed by extracting spiked soil with analyte concentrations of 0.1-50 µg/kg. Coefficients of determination of the linear calibration were between 0.94-0.98 for the PDMS/DVB and 0.92-0.99 for the C<sub>18</sub>. Limits of detection range between 0.01-10 µg/kg for the PDMS/DVB and 0.1-10 µg/kg for the C<sub>18</sub>. Overall, the C<sub>18</sub> analytically outperformed the PDMS/DVB but required a longer extraction time (120 min vs 75 min for the PDMS/DVB). This method allows automation and generates low residual toxic waste, having the potential to be introduced as a greener and simpler alternative to currently used sample preparation methodologies.
Authors
- João Brinco
- Paula Guedes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5853-0192)
- Marco Gomes da Silva (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1761-7376)
- Alexandra B. Ribeiro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5606-3591)
- Raquel Carvalho (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8929-7936)
- Eduardo P. Mateus (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7397-9438)
Institutions
- Sustainability Institute (ZA)
- Rede de Química e Tecnologia (PT)
- Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Chromatography A
- Published
- 2024-08-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465295
- Citations
- 9
- Primary Topic
- Analytical chemistry methods development
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.12
Funders
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia