Investigation of the cooling hole blockage induced by different thermal spray TBC deposition processes

High-temperature turbine airfoils and combustion chamber walls in jet engines require sufficient cooling via cooling holes and thermal barrier coating systems (TBCs) to protect them from hot combustion gases. As the demand for greater efficiency and higher firing temperatures in jet engines increases, there is a corresponding need for more advanced film cooling methods, such as the use of more complex hole geometries. The use of Additive Layer Manufacturing (ALM) techniques allows the production of such intricate cooling holes, enhancing the flow of cooling air onto component surfaces. Conventional TBC deposition techniques, for example Atmospheric Plasma Spraying (APS) or Electron Beam Physical Vapor Deposition (EB-PVD), often lead to partial or complete blockage of cooling holes. This study compares the blockage of TBCs deposited on conventionally-sheet alloys with standard cooling holes and ALM alloys with more complex cooling holes using APS as a baseline process. Additionally, alternative plasma spray deposition technologies such as Suspension Plasma Spraying (SPS) and Plasma Spray-Physical Vapor Deposition (PS-PVD) were explored. The aim was to determine the effectiveness of these processes in preventing blockage compared to the traditional APS process. The experimental results showed that the formation of the coating, whether originating from splats or from the vapor phase, the feedstock particle size, and the cooling hole geometry can all affect the blockage. It was demonstrated that PS-PVD, with its vapor-induced deposition, is highly effective in minimizing blockage, regardless of the cooling hole geometry. • The spraying of bond coats can lead to significant blockage due to splashing. • AM-substrates with intricate cooling holes reduced blockage by APS. • Small particles sprayed by SPS can deflect into cooling holes, increasing blockage. • PS-PVD top coats showed the least blockage, regardless of the cooling hole geometry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surface and Coatings Technology
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2024.131278
Citations
6
Primary Topic
High-Temperature Coating Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation of the cooling hole blockage induced by different thermal spray TBC deposition processes

Emine Bakan, Olivier Guillon, Robert Vaßen, Susanne Schrüfer et al.
6 citations
Surface and Coatings Technology
High-Temperature Coating Behaviors
7.79
article

Investigation of the cooling hole blockage induced by different thermal spray TBC deposition processes

Emine Bakan, Olivier Guillon, Robert Vaßen, Susanne Schrüfer, Martin Rüßmann
article en
6 citations

Abstract

High-temperature turbine airfoils and combustion chamber walls in jet engines require sufficient cooling via cooling holes and thermal barrier coating systems (TBCs) to protect them from hot combustion gases. As the demand for greater efficiency and higher firing temperatures in jet engines increases, there is a corresponding need for more advanced film cooling methods, such as the use of more complex hole geometries. The use of Additive Layer Manufacturing (ALM) techniques allows the production of such intricate cooling holes, enhancing the flow of cooling air onto component surfaces. Conventional TBC deposition techniques, for example Atmospheric Plasma Spraying (APS) or Electron Beam Physical Vapor Deposition (EB-PVD), often lead to partial or complete blockage of cooling holes. This study compares the blockage of TBCs deposited on conventionally-sheet alloys with standard cooling holes and ALM alloys with more complex cooling holes using APS as a baseline process. Additionally, alternative plasma spray deposition technologies such as Suspension Plasma Spraying (SPS) and Plasma Spray-Physical Vapor Deposition (PS-PVD) were explored. The aim was to determine the effectiveness of these processes in preventing blockage compared to the traditional APS process. The experimental results showed that the formation of the coating, whether originating from splats or from the vapor phase, the feedstock particle size, and the cooling hole geometry can all affect the blockage. It was demonstrated that PS-PVD, with its vapor-induced deposition, is highly effective in minimizing blockage, regardless of the cooling hole geometry. • The spraying of bond coats can lead to significant blockage due to splashing. • AM-substrates with intricate cooling holes reduced blockage by APS. • Small particles sprayed by SPS can deflect into cooling holes, increasing blockage. • PS-PVD top coats showed the least blockage, regardless of the cooling hole geometry.

Surface and Coatings TechnologyVol. 493
Rolls-Royce (Germany) (DE), Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), Jülich Aachen Research Alliance (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
High-Temperature Coating Behaviors
7.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.