Approximating problems in abstract argumentation with graph convolutional networks

In this article, we present a novel approximation approach for abstract argumentation using a customized Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) architecture and a tailored training method. Our approach demonstrates promising results in approximating abstract argumentation tasks across various semantics, setting a new state of the art for performance on certain tasks. We provide a detailed analysis of approximation and runtime performance and propose a new scheme for evaluation. By advancing the state of the art for approximating the acceptability status of abstract arguments, we make theoretical and empirical advances in understanding the limits and opportunities for approximation in this field. Our approach shows potential for creating both general purpose and task-specific approximators and offers insights into the performance differences across benchmarks and semantics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Intelligence
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2024.104209
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Approximating problems in abstract argumentation with graph convolutional networks

Lars Malmqvist, Tangming Yuan, Peter Nightingale
4 citations
Artificial Intelligence
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
1.39
article

Approximating problems in abstract argumentation with graph convolutional networks

Lars Malmqvist, Tangming Yuan, Peter Nightingale
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In this article, we present a novel approximation approach for abstract argumentation using a customized Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) architecture and a tailored training method. Our approach demonstrates promising results in approximating abstract argumentation tasks across various semantics, setting a new state of the art for performance on certain tasks. We provide a detailed analysis of approximation and runtime performance and propose a new scheme for evaluation. By advancing the state of the art for approximating the acceptability status of abstract arguments, we make theoretical and empirical advances in understanding the limits and opportunities for approximation in this field. Our approach shows potential for creating both general purpose and task-specific approximators and offers insights into the performance differences across benchmarks and semantics.

Artificial IntelligenceVol. 336
University of York (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Approximating problems in abstract argumentation with graph convolutional networks — Lars Malmqvist, Tangming Yuan, et al. · Artificial Intelligence (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS