COMPARISON BETWEEN DEEP NEURAL NETWORK AND PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS ALGORITHM IN FACE RECOGNITION

Face recognition is one technology that is commonly used now. Therefore, various algorithms continue to be developed to obtain maximum results with minimum costs. One of them is the Deep Neural Network or DNN algorithm. While DNN requires a large dataset to train the algorithm, another algorithm called the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) algorithm works good in a smaller dataset. These algorithms are compared to know which algorithm has the better result in given circumstances. Later the accuracy, speed, and optimality of the algorithms are analyzed. By comparing these algorithms, we could know which algorithm is preferable in given circumstances. After the experiment is done, we can assume that the two algorithms have a slight difference in terms of accuracy. Also, the time used for running the PCA implementation code is slightly longer than DNN. However, that does not mean that the PCA algorithm is not great. If the dataset to be used is limited, PCA is going to be a good choice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proxies Jurnal Informatika
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24167/proxies.v5i1.12445
Primary Topic
Computer Science and Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARISON BETWEEN DEEP NEURAL NETWORK AND PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS ALGORITHM IN FACE RECOGNITION

Robertus Setiawan Aji Nugroho, Nadya Angela
Proxies Jurnal Informatika
Computer Science and Engineering
article

COMPARISON BETWEEN DEEP NEURAL NETWORK AND PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS ALGORITHM IN FACE RECOGNITION

Robertus Setiawan Aji Nugroho, Nadya Angela
article en

Abstract

Face recognition is one technology that is commonly used now. Therefore, various algorithms continue to be developed to obtain maximum results with minimum costs. One of them is the Deep Neural Network or DNN algorithm. While DNN requires a large dataset to train the algorithm, another algorithm called the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) algorithm works good in a smaller dataset. These algorithms are compared to know which algorithm has the better result in given circumstances. Later the accuracy, speed, and optimality of the algorithms are analyzed. By comparing these algorithms, we could know which algorithm is preferable in given circumstances. After the experiment is done, we can assume that the two algorithms have a slight difference in terms of accuracy. Also, the time used for running the PCA implementation code is slightly longer than DNN. However, that does not mean that the PCA algorithm is not great. If the dataset to be used is limited, PCA is going to be a good choice.

Proxies Jurnal InformatikaVol. 5(1)
Soegijapranata Catholic University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Computer Science and Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.