Planning for green infrastructure by integrating multi-driver: Ranking priority based on accessibility equity

• Five GI planning drivers are considered to capture the multifunctionality of GI. • Residents’ aggregation pattern should play a role in GI planning. • We identify priority locations for GI interventions based on the principle of accessibility-equity. • Priority orders decrease in suburbs while increasing in city center. • Adaptive GI development strategy is proposed to response to the four GI intervention zones. Green infrastructure provides multifarious benefits, improving urban resilience and sustainability amid increasing climate change and urbanization. Traditional green infrastructure planning studies were based on the spatial-equity principle, which usually neglected residents’ aggregation pattern, leading to the conflict with equitable green exposure. Using the sponge city of Zhengzhou as a case, this study proposes a novel priority ranking strategy, namely accessibility equity. We first spatially quantified the regional socioecological conditions on 0.25 km 2 grids as green infrastructure planning drivers, including stormwater management, urban thermal environment, air quality, habitat maintenance and water purification. Subsequently we integrated these planning drivers with population density to conduct spatial autocorrelation analysis, priority ranking, and grid clustering. While most planning drivers are positively correlated with population density, except air quality, some areas show opposite trends in terms of local perspective, suggesting that the spatial equity may lead to mismatch between residents’ demand and GI priority. The priority order based on accessibility equity, rises in the city center and falls in suburbs and industrial zones. The study area is divided into four categories using k-means clustering, and we propose the corresponding adaptive green infrastructure development strategy. The framework can be a practical tool for guiding green infrastructure and sponge city projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Cities and Society
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105767
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Planning for green infrastructure by integrating multi-driver: Ranking priority based on accessibility equity

Yanmei Ye, Dagmar Haase, Runjia Yang, Angela Lausch et al.
19 citations
Sustainable Cities and Society
Urban Transport and Accessibility
12.98
article

Planning for green infrastructure by integrating multi-driver: Ranking priority based on accessibility equity

Yanmei Ye, Dagmar Haase, Runjia Yang, Angela Lausch, Shengao Yi, Xinyu Dong
article en
19 citations

Abstract

• Five GI planning drivers are considered to capture the multifunctionality of GI. • Residents’ aggregation pattern should play a role in GI planning. • We identify priority locations for GI interventions based on the principle of accessibility-equity. • Priority orders decrease in suburbs while increasing in city center. • Adaptive GI development strategy is proposed to response to the four GI intervention zones. Green infrastructure provides multifarious benefits, improving urban resilience and sustainability amid increasing climate change and urbanization. Traditional green infrastructure planning studies were based on the spatial-equity principle, which usually neglected residents’ aggregation pattern, leading to the conflict with equitable green exposure. Using the sponge city of Zhengzhou as a case, this study proposes a novel priority ranking strategy, namely accessibility equity. We first spatially quantified the regional socioecological conditions on 0.25 km 2 grids as green infrastructure planning drivers, including stormwater management, urban thermal environment, air quality, habitat maintenance and water purification. Subsequently we integrated these planning drivers with population density to conduct spatial autocorrelation analysis, priority ranking, and grid clustering. While most planning drivers are positively correlated with population density, except air quality, some areas show opposite trends in terms of local perspective, suggesting that the spatial equity may lead to mismatch between residents’ demand and GI priority. The priority order based on accessibility equity, rises in the city center and falls in suburbs and industrial zones. The study area is divided into four categories using k-means clustering, and we propose the corresponding adaptive green infrastructure development strategy. The framework can be a practical tool for guiding green infrastructure and sponge city projects.

Sustainable Cities and SocietyVol. 114
University City Science Center (US), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), GeoInformation (United Kingdom) (GB), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE), Zhejiang University (CN), University of Pennsylvania (US)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
12.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.