Mandatory disclosure and corporate <scp>ESG</scp> performance: Evidence from China's “explanation for nondisclosure” requirement

Abstract This paper examines the impact of mandatory disclosure requirement on corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance, specifically within the framework of China's “Dual‐Carbon” targets. Utilizing data on ESG performance of nonfinancial companies listed in mainland China from 2013 to 2021 and the implementation of the “explanation for nondisclosure” requirement by the Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX) in 2016 as a quasi‐experiment, this study employs a difference‐in‐difference approach for empirical analysis. The findings reveal that the implementation of “explanation for nondisclosure” requirement has resulted in an average increase of 0.57 points in the ESG performance scores of corporations. Mechanism analysis indicates that this requirement promotes ESG performance by curbing corporate managerial myopia and enhancing the quality of internal controls. Further analysis using a triple difference model (DDD) reveals that the impact of the “explanation for nondisclosure” requirement is more pronounced for companies in heavily polluting industries. These findings are significant for understanding the role of mandatory ESG disclosure policies in promoting corporate green transformation and sustainable development. The results not only empirically support the advancement toward China's “Dual‐Carbon” goals but also offer insights for global policymakers in similar regulatory environments. Additionally, this study underscores the pivotal role of regulatory frameworks in aligning corporate strategies with global sustainability objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2944
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mandatory disclosure and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China's “explanation for nondisclosure” requirement

Lingli Qi, Deqin Lin, Longsheng Wu, Siyao Liu
18 citations
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
9.98
article

Mandatory disclosure and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China's “explanation for nondisclosure” requirement

Lingli Qi, Deqin Lin, Longsheng Wu, Siyao Liu
article en
18 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the impact of mandatory disclosure requirement on corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance, specifically within the framework of China's “Dual‐Carbon” targets. Utilizing data on ESG performance of nonfinancial companies listed in mainland China from 2013 to 2021 and the implementation of the “explanation for nondisclosure” requirement by the Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX) in 2016 as a quasi‐experiment, this study employs a difference‐in‐difference approach for empirical analysis. The findings reveal that the implementation of “explanation for nondisclosure” requirement has resulted in an average increase of 0.57 points in the ESG performance scores of corporations. Mechanism analysis indicates that this requirement promotes ESG performance by curbing corporate managerial myopia and enhancing the quality of internal controls. Further analysis using a triple difference model (DDD) reveals that the impact of the “explanation for nondisclosure” requirement is more pronounced for companies in heavily polluting industries. These findings are significant for understanding the role of mandatory ESG disclosure policies in promoting corporate green transformation and sustainable development. The results not only empirically support the advancement toward China's “Dual‐Carbon” goals but also offer insights for global policymakers in similar regulatory environments. Additionally, this study underscores the pivotal role of regulatory frameworks in aligning corporate strategies with global sustainability objectives.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental ManagementVol. 32(1)
University of Auckland (NZ), City University of Macau (MO)
National Social Science Fund of China
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
9.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.