The role of the iron and steel sector in achieving net zero U.S. CO2 emissions by 2050

• The availability of CCS technologies and additional scrap-based electric arc furnace could be instrumental in achieving the deep decarbonization of the U.S. steel sector. • Hydrogen-based direct reduced iron becomes essential in the U.S. steel decarbonization pathways in which CCS is not available. • Energy efficiency, demand reduction, and decarbonization of hydrogen and electricity production are key steel sector mitigation measures. • Addressing the embodied carbon emissions associated with steel trade is key for the U.S. steel sector decarbonization. The U.S. steel sector is a hard-to-abate sector because of its heavy dependence on fossil fuels and its high capital requirements. In 2015, the sector was one of the major carbon emitters, contributing 10 % of the U.S. industrial CO 2 emissions. The ability to decarbonize the U.S. iron and steel sector directly affects the ability of the U.S. to achieve economy-wide net zero CO 2 by 2050. In this paper, we use the Global Change Analysis Model (GCAM) to analyze different U.S. steel sector decarbonization pathways under varying technology, policy, and demand futures. These pathways provide insights on how various low-carbon steelmaking technologies such as those using carbon capture and storage (CCS), hydrogen, or scrap could help reduce U.S. steel emissions by mid-century. In our primary decarbonization pathway, we find that nearly all of the conventional fossil-based steelmaking capacity is fully integrated with CCS by 2050. However, without CCS availability, almost all of the conventional fossil-based steelmaking is phased-out by 2050 and is replaced by hydrogen-based production. Scrap-based production continues to remain vital across both of these decarbonization pathways. Furthermore, we find that demand reduction could help reduce the required levels of CCS and hydrogen-based production in the decarbonization pathways. Implementation of advanced energy efficiency measures could help substantially reduce the sector's energy usage. Finally, we observe that addressing the embodied carbon transfer associated with steel imports will be crucial for fully decarbonizing the U.S. steel sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy and Climate Change
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100152
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of the iron and steel sector in achieving net zero U.S. CO2 emissions by 2050

Siddarth Durga, Jae Edmonds, Simone Speizer
17 citations
Energy and Climate Change
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
3.61
article

The role of the iron and steel sector in achieving net zero U.S. CO2 emissions by 2050

Siddarth Durga, Jae Edmonds, Simone Speizer
article en
17 citations

Abstract

• The availability of CCS technologies and additional scrap-based electric arc furnace could be instrumental in achieving the deep decarbonization of the U.S. steel sector. • Hydrogen-based direct reduced iron becomes essential in the U.S. steel decarbonization pathways in which CCS is not available. • Energy efficiency, demand reduction, and decarbonization of hydrogen and electricity production are key steel sector mitigation measures. • Addressing the embodied carbon emissions associated with steel trade is key for the U.S. steel sector decarbonization. The U.S. steel sector is a hard-to-abate sector because of its heavy dependence on fossil fuels and its high capital requirements. In 2015, the sector was one of the major carbon emitters, contributing 10 % of the U.S. industrial CO 2 emissions. The ability to decarbonize the U.S. iron and steel sector directly affects the ability of the U.S. to achieve economy-wide net zero CO 2 by 2050. In this paper, we use the Global Change Analysis Model (GCAM) to analyze different U.S. steel sector decarbonization pathways under varying technology, policy, and demand futures. These pathways provide insights on how various low-carbon steelmaking technologies such as those using carbon capture and storage (CCS), hydrogen, or scrap could help reduce U.S. steel emissions by mid-century. In our primary decarbonization pathway, we find that nearly all of the conventional fossil-based steelmaking capacity is fully integrated with CCS by 2050. However, without CCS availability, almost all of the conventional fossil-based steelmaking is phased-out by 2050 and is replaced by hydrogen-based production. Scrap-based production continues to remain vital across both of these decarbonization pathways. Furthermore, we find that demand reduction could help reduce the required levels of CCS and hydrogen-based production in the decarbonization pathways. Implementation of advanced energy efficiency measures could help substantially reduce the sector's energy usage. Finally, we observe that addressing the embodied carbon transfer associated with steel imports will be crucial for fully decarbonizing the U.S. steel sector.

Energy and Climate ChangeVol. 5
Joint Global Change Research Institute (US), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Battelle, Office of Fossil Energy, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
3.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.