Characterizing acoustic dimensions of health-related urban greenspace

• Analysis of the acoustic environment of greenspace in high spatial resolution. • We identify eleven acoustic dimensions of the urban environment. • We identify three acoustic dimensions substantially associated with greenspace. • These three dimensions could lie on pathways between greenspace and human health. • They can be represented by Acoustic Richness, the Articulation Index and Link Density. The association of urban greenspace and human health and well-being is widely recognised, but the underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood. The acoustic environment (AE) is frequently proposed as a mediator between greenspace and human health. While it is commonly viewed as a negative health factor (e.g. noise pollution), there is growing evidence that it also has positive effects on human health. However, a general problem is the lack of information on the AE for greenspaces in high spatial resolution. To provide evidence-based support for research on this issue, we identify and assess acoustic properties of health-related urban greenspace by estimating the association between urban green area and selected acoustic indices. The analysis is based on 5-minute audio recordings collected systematically from 730 locations, four times a year (n = 2,746) in Bochum, Germany. To quantify the acoustic properties, we use an indicator-set of 30 sound pressure levels, 11 eco-, 78 psychoacoustic indices and 3 complex network measures. Greenspace is defined, in alignment with various health studies, as the percentage of green area within three buffer sizes (50, 100, 300 m) around each recording location. Through cluster analysis, we identify eleven acoustic dimensions in our indicator-set, for which representative indices are derived using principal component analysis. Descriptive statistics and multi-level regression models are used to analyse the associations between representative indices and greenspace. We find the highest effect sizes for Link Density (representing “acoustic dominance”), Acoustic Richness (representing “persistent sound volume”) and the Articulation Index (representing “sound volume”). Thus, in addition to “sound volume”, the AE of urban greenspace is characterised to a similar extent by at least two additional acoustic dimensions. If properties of the AE act as mediators between urban greenspace and human health, these three acoustic dimensions hold the potential to reflect them. Studies on pathways between greenspace and human health could incorporate measures of these dimensions to extend the understanding of the AE’s relevance for Public Health.