Development of bioflocculants for mineral processing

Mining and minerals processing are essential to modern society, and the demand for metals and minerals is increasing due to the rapid development of clean energy technologies, such as electric vehicles, solar panels, wind turbines, etc. The mining industry, however, is facing significant challenges in meeting sustainability and environmental goals. As more minerals are extracted, the use of water increases, leading to greater wastewater and tailings production. To tackle this issue, flocculants are commonly used across mining sites to dewater waste streams by binding and settling particles, to allow for improved solid-liquid separation. While conventional flocculants (synthetic polymers often derived from petrochemicals) are effective in rapidly settling particles, they present several issues, such as high levels of entrapped water, ineffective fine particle separation, and environmental and health concerns. To address these challenges, bioflocculants have been proposed as alternative flocculants. This review explores three main bioflocculant research directions, including plant based, graft copolymers, and microbial flocculants, discussing the advantages and disadvantages of each. The ratio of flocculant dose to suspended solids (i.e. flocculant dose ratio) and the flocculation efficiency in these studies related to mineral and mining wastewater solid-liquid separation are evaluated. Finally, the review proposes future opportunities and directions to mitigate issues that have historically made bioflocculants less appealing. These include enhancing the recyclability of flocculants as well as advancing protein design and modification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials Today Sustainability
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2024.100965
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of bioflocculants for mineral processing

George V. Franks, Grant B. Webber, Chun‐Xia Zhao, Guangze Yang et al.
3 citations
Materials Today Sustainability
Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
0.60
article

Development of bioflocculants for mineral processing

George V. Franks, Grant B. Webber, Chun‐Xia Zhao, Guangze Yang, Matthias J. Orchard
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Mining and minerals processing are essential to modern society, and the demand for metals and minerals is increasing due to the rapid development of clean energy technologies, such as electric vehicles, solar panels, wind turbines, etc. The mining industry, however, is facing significant challenges in meeting sustainability and environmental goals. As more minerals are extracted, the use of water increases, leading to greater wastewater and tailings production. To tackle this issue, flocculants are commonly used across mining sites to dewater waste streams by binding and settling particles, to allow for improved solid-liquid separation. While conventional flocculants (synthetic polymers often derived from petrochemicals) are effective in rapidly settling particles, they present several issues, such as high levels of entrapped water, ineffective fine particle separation, and environmental and health concerns. To address these challenges, bioflocculants have been proposed as alternative flocculants. This review explores three main bioflocculant research directions, including plant based, graft copolymers, and microbial flocculants, discussing the advantages and disadvantages of each. The ratio of flocculant dose to suspended solids (i.e. flocculant dose ratio) and the flocculation efficiency in these studies related to mineral and mining wastewater solid-liquid separation are evaluated. Finally, the review proposes future opportunities and directions to mitigate issues that have historically made bioflocculants less appealing. These include enhancing the recyclability of flocculants as well as advancing protein design and modification.

Materials Today SustainabilityVol. 28
The University of Melbourne (AU), ARC Centre of Excellence for Enabling Eco-Efficient Beneficiation of Minerals (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
0.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.