Navigators’ Perspective on Information Requirements for Supervisory Control of Autonomous Ships

This study explores the application of agent transparency in the context of autonomous ships. Four levels of transparency were developed depicting decisions, planned actions, reasoning, and input parameters of a collision and grounding avoidance system in a realistic navigational context. Thirty-four licensed navigators were provided with Human Machine Interface concepts depicting four levels of transparency. Qualitative feedback was obtained through semi-structured interviews about which information they felt is needed to supervise autonomous ships safely and effectively. In addition, the participants’ ranked the HMIs according to their preferences. The results indicate the need for depicting the outcomes of the system’s collision risk analysis for supervisory control. Furthermore, the results illustrate the variations in supervisory strategies and the resulting dilemma for the amount and type of information required to support supervisors. Finally, this study highlights the importance of expert knowledge in the design of safety critical systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241261686
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigators’ Perspective on Information Requirements for Supervisory Control of Autonomous Ships

Koen van de Merwe, Øystein Engelhardtsen, Salman Nazir, Steven Mallam
3 citations
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
1.93
article

Navigators’ Perspective on Information Requirements for Supervisory Control of Autonomous Ships

Koen van de Merwe, Øystein Engelhardtsen, Salman Nazir, Steven Mallam
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study explores the application of agent transparency in the context of autonomous ships. Four levels of transparency were developed depicting decisions, planned actions, reasoning, and input parameters of a collision and grounding avoidance system in a realistic navigational context. Thirty-four licensed navigators were provided with Human Machine Interface concepts depicting four levels of transparency. Qualitative feedback was obtained through semi-structured interviews about which information they felt is needed to supervise autonomous ships safely and effectively. In addition, the participants’ ranked the HMIs according to their preferences. The results indicate the need for depicting the outcomes of the system’s collision risk analysis for supervisory control. Furthermore, the results illustrate the variations in supervisory strategies and the resulting dilemma for the amount and type of information required to support supervisors. Finally, this study highlights the importance of expert knowledge in the design of safety critical systems.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 68(1)
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA), DNV (Norway) (NO), University of South-Eastern Norway (NO)
Norges Forskningsråd
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
1.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Navigators’ Perspective on Information Requirements for Supervisory Control of Autonomous Ships — Koen van de Merwe, Øystein Engelhardtsen, et al. · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS